From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756279Ab1KHS1n (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:43 -0500
Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:30548 "EHLO
	rcsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751501Ab1KHS1m (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:42 -0500
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request
Message-ID: <20111108182728.GR4954@shiny>
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20111106183851.GA4339@shiny>
 <CAPL5yKcDKnB+BaTdARSp80pGVr_W36cy9gNz=M-S8E3NyNDTQg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAPL5yKcDKnB+BaTdARSp80pGVr_W36cy9gNz=M-S8E3NyNDTQg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090201.4EB97498.0164,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Dan Merillat wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of long
> > running projects and cleanup queues.  I've got btrfs patches in the new
> > kernel.org btrfs repo.  There are two different branches with the same
> > changes.  for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested against
> > Linus' tree as of yesterday.
> 
> [91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2
> [91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed
> 
> FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that
> whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again.  Format change in 3.2 or
> 32/64 bit compatibility issues?

I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 and
3.1 code before releasing.  I didn't try jumping between 32 and 64 bit.

Are there any other messages in dmesg?  Could you please see what
btrfs-debug-tree says?

-chris