From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com,
bp@alien8.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
casteyde.christian@free.fr
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: kmemcheck: annotate ->lock in lockdep_init_map()
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:04:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111109080451.GB8124@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320745246.2244.12.camel@twins>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:40:46AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 17:07 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > So something like below?
>
> that fails to clear/init the class_cache, leading to all sorts of
> problems.
>
> Wiping the class_cache just reduces performance somewhat, not wiping
> them is disastrous since it can results in wild pointer derefs.
>
> Now we could fix up register_lock_class() to reset the class_cache,
> although that's a little tricky and I'm not sure its worth it.
Yeah, I have done some benchmark which show it's worthful, please
check patch#2.
And below is the one which cure the current problem.
Thanks,
Yong
---
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: kmemcheck: annotate ->lock in lockdep_init_map()
Since commit f59de89 [lockdep: Clear whole lockdep_map on initialization],
lockdep_init_map() will clear all the struct. But it will break
lock_set_class()/lock_set_subclass(). A typical race condition
is like below:
CPU A CPU B
lock_set_subclass(lockA);
lock_set_class(lockA);
lockdep_init_map(lockA);
/* lockA->name is cleared */
memset(lockA);
__lock_acquire(lockA);
/* lockA->class_cache[] is cleared */
register_lock_class(lockA);
look_up_lock_class(lockA);
WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name !=
lock->name);
lock->name = name;
So restore to what we have done before commit f59de89 but annotate
->lock with kmemcheck_mark_initialized() to suppress the kmemcheck
warning reported in commit f59de89.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Suggested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index e69434b..21ea1dc 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2948,7 +2948,12 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key, int subclass)
{
- memset(lock, 0, sizeof(*lock));
+ int i;
+
+ kmemcheck_mark_initialized(lock, sizeof(*lock));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES; i++)
+ lock->class_cache[i] = NULL;
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
lock->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-09 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 9:26 [PATCH 0/4] patches to cure race in lock_set_class() Yong Zhang
2011-11-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] lockdep: lock_set_subclass() fix Yong Zhang
2011-11-07 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 13:31 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-07 14:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-07 13:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-11-07 15:28 ` Vegard Nossum
2011-11-07 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 16:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-07 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-08 2:58 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-08 3:02 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-08 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-08 8:14 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-08 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-08 9:07 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-08 9:37 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-08 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-09 8:04 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-11-09 8:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: always try to set ->class_cache in register_lock_class() lockdep_init_map() Yong Zhang
2011-11-18 23:39 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Always " tip-bot for Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 9:39 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep, kmemcheck: Annotate ->lock in lockdep_init_map() tip-bot for Yong Zhang
2011-12-06 19:56 ` David Rientjes
2011-12-06 20:14 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Yong Zhang
2011-11-08 2:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] lockdep: lock_set_subclass() fix Yong Zhang
2011-11-04 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] lockdep: Let register_lock_class() can be called with/without graph_lock Yong Zhang
2011-11-04 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] lockdep: split lockdep_init_map() Yong Zhang
2011-11-04 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] lockdep: fix race condition in __lock_set_class() Yong Zhang
2011-11-07 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 13:26 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-06 11:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] patches to cure race in lock_set_class() Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111109080451.GB8124@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=casteyde.christian@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox