From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933965Ab1KJIHX (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:07:23 -0500 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:36559 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933670Ab1KJIHU (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:07:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:07:02 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make dmi_name_in_vendors more focused Message-ID: <20111110090702.6187e8f9@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20111110043520.47e78e9c@jbarnes-x220> References: <20111104102647.0b3eba22@endymion.delvare> <20111109142557.70cb43cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20111110043520.47e78e9c@jbarnes-x220> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:35:20 +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:25:57 -0800 > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:26:47 +0100 > > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > This patch was already sent on 2011-05-15. I thought Andrew had > > > picked it up but apparently not, otherwise it should already be > > > upstream by now. > > > > I did merge it in May and have carried it in -mm (and hence in > > linux-next) since then. I have sent it to Jesse at least twice, with > > no effect. > > I don't generally look after DMI stuff... Indeed I'm not sure why Jesse would take this, it's not PCI-related in any way. > I can queue it though if you > want. My only worry is potential breakage for existing DMI matches, > but it looks like Jean already did the audit for that. Yes I did, both at the time of the original submission and again when resending. -- Jean Delvare