From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench sched cpu-matrix benchmark
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:52:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111110145201.GA29614@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111104115620.GA25704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the discussion of the nohz load balancer fix
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/27/197), Ingo Molnar suggested
> to replace the simple while1 loop, used for publishing the
> test results with cpu-matrix test. This patch adds cpu-matrix
> benchmark under perf bench.
>
> TODO:
> - Provide option to run main thread at real-time priority.
> - Provide option for changing scheduling priority/policy
> of worker threads.
>
>
> perf bench: Add sched cpu-matrix benchmark
>
> perf bench sched cpu-matrix benchmark is a matrix multiplication
> workload, which can be replaced with the traditional while1
> cpu hog.
>
> Example of usage:
>
> % perf bench sched cpu-matrix
> # Running sched/cpu-matrix benchmark...
>
> Multiplication of [20] x [20] matrix, using [1] threads
> Total time: 0.000170 [sec]
>
> % perf bench sched cpu-matrix -s1k -t3
> # Running sched/cpu-matrix benchmark...
> elapsed time = 0.100066 sec, progress = 27270868
> elapsed time = 0.100079 sec, progress = 27299841
> elapsed time = 0.100071 sec, progress = 27253513
> elapsed time = 0.100073 sec, progress = 27272693
> elapsed time = 0.100090 sec, progress = 10208415
>
> Multiplication of [1024] x [1024] matrix, using [3] threads
> Total time: 0.500495 [sec]
It would be nice to also print the *size* of the matrix, in MBs or
so. 1024x1024 of int, long, float ... or double?
Looks pretty useful otherwise. Arnaldo, any objections?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 11:56 [PATCH] perf bench sched cpu-matrix benchmark Kamalesh Babulal
2011-11-04 12:50 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-11-10 14:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-11-14 8:57 ` [PATCH V2] " Kamalesh Babulal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111110145201.GA29614@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox