From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 amd_gart_64: Verify we can perform the remapping requested
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:31:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111111153148.GC11779@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111024100735.GL1512@8bytes.org>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:07:36PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:20:15PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > Recently I had a driver try with a peculiar 2G dma memory limit.
> > The driver failed in weird and strange ways because the GART remapping
> > apperture had been allocated above 2G where the driver cound not reach,
> > and no error was reported when the mappings were setup.
> >
> > Implement gart_dma_supported to test for this problem case and to return
> > and error if we can not support the remapping.
>
> You do basically the same as for swiotlb, so it must be good :)
Okay, thinking more about this, I am not so sure anymore it is a really
good idea to fix it this way. It basically signals the driver that DMA
is not possible with the device if the aperture does not fit into
the dma_mask. But DMA within the ZONE_DMA might still work, no?
So I think the right way to fix it is to return a dma-mapping error if
and only if the address needs to be remapped by the aperture (of swiotlb or
gart).
This still allows the driver to use GFP_DMA allocations.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 21:19 [PATCH 1/2] x86 swiotlb: Verify we can perform the remapping requested Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 amd_gart_64: " Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-24 10:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-11 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-11-11 18:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-12 9:02 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-10-21 0:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86 swiotlb: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-10-24 15:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-27 0:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-10-27 6:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111111153148.GC11779@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).