From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 amd_gart_64: Verify we can perform the remapping requested
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:02:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111112090203.GD11779@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m11uteo57u.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:59:33AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
> > Okay, thinking more about this, I am not so sure anymore it is a really
> > good idea to fix it this way. It basically signals the driver that DMA
> > is not possible with the device if the aperture does not fit into
> > the dma_mask. But DMA within the ZONE_DMA might still work, no?
> >
> > So I think the right way to fix it is to return a dma-mapping error if
> > and only if the address needs to be remapped by the aperture (of swiotlb or
> > gart).
>
> Perhaps I am mistaken but since the method is iommu type specific if we
> don't actually use the iommu we should not call the method so I think
> this is patch is already implementing what you want.
No it does not. With GART or SWIOTLB all DMA-mapping functions call
directly into the IOMMU driver. The driver then checks whether it needs
to remap or not (see dma_capable() in SWIOTLB or need_iommu() in GART).
I think the check you want to add needs to happen after these checks in
each of the IOMMU drivers.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-12 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 21:19 [PATCH 1/2] x86 swiotlb: Verify we can perform the remapping requested Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 amd_gart_64: " Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-24 10:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-11 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-11 18:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-12 9:02 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-10-21 0:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86 swiotlb: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-10-24 15:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-10-27 0:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-10-27 6:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111112090203.GD11779@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).