From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754118Ab1KMQBV (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:01:21 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56433 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753629Ab1KMQBU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:01:20 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:58:34 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Corentin Chary Cc: Matthew Garrett , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] Samsung Laptop driver patches - resend Message-ID: <20111113155834.GA7838@suse.de> References: <20110920161743.GA32737@kroah.com> <20111107181209.GB5474@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:52:29AM +0100, Corentin Chary wrote: > However, I have a quick question: what does "wireless button" control > exactly ? Because my laptop (SwSmi@ one), seems to have a totally > different command to control rfkill (both for bluetooth and wlan). My > guess is that command do the same thing that happens when you press > the Fn+F12 key, but if it's really that I'd prefer use the "true" > rfkill interface with differencied control for bluetooth and wlan. I think it controlled the wireless on/off on some machines, others might be different. And it should be using rfkill, right? greg k-h