From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753335Ab1KPFnw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:43:52 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:60183 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753120Ab1KPFnv (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:43:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:41:56 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Vivien Didelot Cc: x86@kernel.org, Jonas Fonseca , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v2 3/4] platform: (TS-5500) add LED support Message-ID: <20111116054156.GA20847@elte.hu> References: <1314402027-11293-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <1314402027-11293-4-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20111012153415.GA26529@elte.hu> <20111016014203.1dfb2cb8@lenov0n> <20111015145646.GA9516@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111015145646.GA9516@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Vivien Didelot wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:34:15 +0200, > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > * Vivien Didelot wrote: > > > > > > > From: Jonas Fonseca > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot > > > > > > That's not a valid signoff sequence. Did you intend this to be: > > > > > > From: Jonas Fonseca > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca > > > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot > > > > > > ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ingo > > > > Yes, this should be signed off by Jonas Fonseca as well. This will > > be updated in the next patches set. > > I've already applied the current patches with the SOBs fixed (the > merge window is getting close), to the tip:x86/platform branch. > > Please send any fixes as add-on delta patches against tip:master: > > git://tesla.tglx.de/git/linux-2.6-tip.git (tap, tap, is this thing on?) Should i drop these commits: 32a85aa727ce: x86/platform: Add TS-5500 ADC support 3a338d79aa95: x86/platform: Add TS-5500 LED support 2437b498abac: x86/platform: Add TS-5500 GPIO support 37f9a16c166c: x86/platform: Add TS-5500 base support from tip:x86/platform? Had this (probably trivial) build failure been fixed when i reported it over a month ago then these commits could have been included in the v3.2 upstream kernel - now they will probably have to be delayed to v3.3. Thanks, Ingo