From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@solonet.org.ua>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add flags to export GPIOs when requesting
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:10:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111116091027.GB2596@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC371FE.5010402@solonet.org.ua>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1257 bytes --]
Hi,
> >> #define GPIOF_EXPORT (1 << 2)
> >> #define GPIOF_EXPORT_DIR_CHANGEABLE (3 << 2)
> >
> > Then you won't have a single flag to check if the dir is changeable.
I played with both versions you mentioned and came to like this one
better, for this reason...
> > direction; just get rid of the two _DIR_ flags. That said, Wolfram's
> > patch seems to follow the conventions already in the file.
>
> Your truth.
...and this reason :)
> > Dong Aisheng posted patch "gpio: introduce gpio_export_array to ease
> > export for gpio arrays". Which should we pick; it doesn't seem like we
> > need both mechanisms.
>
> I vote for GPIOF_* variant (this one) since it can deal with different
> settings for each gpio pin in array.
Huh? I really missed Aisheng's one, otherwise I would have responded to
that. I also think my version is less intrusive and I surely need the
option that some pins may change directions and others may not.
BTW I didn't CC Grant, because he is on sabbatical right now, so Stephen
you are taking care of GPIO?
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-16 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-15 22:44 [PATCH] gpio: add flags to export GPIOs when requesting Wolfram Sang
2011-11-15 23:05 ` Denis Kuzmenko
2011-11-15 23:32 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-16 8:19 ` Denis Kuzmenko
2011-11-16 9:10 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2011-11-16 15:57 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-17 9:10 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-17 9:31 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111116091027.GB2596@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=dong.aisheng@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@solonet.org.ua \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox