From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757921Ab1KPOjJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:39:09 -0500
Received: from na3sys009aog107.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.197]:36515 "EHLO
	na3sys009aog107.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757848Ab1KPOjH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:39:07 -0500
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:39:00 +0100
From: Patrick Combes <p-combes@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Hugo Dupras <h-dupras@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] gpiolib: add irq_wake (power-management) sysfs
 file
Message-ID: <20111116143857.GB5847@una0919255>
References: <1321004406-15663-1-git-send-email-p-combes@ti.com>
 <20111115131636.GA31028@sirena.org.uk>
 <20111115172053.GB9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111115172053.GB9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:20:53PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:16:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:40:06AM +0100, Patrick Combes wrote:
> > > +	else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "enable") || sysfs_streq(buf, "1"))
> > > +		status = enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(gpio));
> > > +	else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "disable") || sysfs_streq(buf, "0"))
> > > +		status = disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(gpio));
> > > +	else
> > > +		status = -EINVAL;
> > 
> > ...this doesn't do anything to stop userspace doing multiple enables and
> > disables.
> 
> It doesn't check whether gpio_to_irq(gpio) returns something sane either.
> It should be doing something like this before taking the mutex:
> 
> 	irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
> 	if (irq <= 0)
> 		return irq < 0 ? irq : -EINVAL;
> 
> and then doing (enable|disable)_irq_wake() on irq.

Ok I add this check