From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>
To: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@gmail.com>
Cc: hjk@hansjkoch.de, gregkh@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: extra large DMA buffer for PCI-E device under UIO
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:27:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111118222718.GF22904@local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B458B2F0-2DDA-461F-A125-8C6C4CDEB6C5@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:16:23PM -0500, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> Hello fellow hackers.
Hi. Could you please limit the line length of your mails to something less
than 80 chars?
>
> I am maintaining a UIO based driver for a PCI-E data acquisition device.
Can you post it? No point in discussing non-existent code...
>
> I map BAR0 of the device to userspace. I also map two memory areas, one is used to feed instructions to the acquisition device, the other is used autonomously by the PCI device to write the acquired data.
>
> The strategy we have been using for those two share memory areas has historically been using pci_alloc_coherent on v2.6.35 x86_64 (limited to 4MB based on my trials) and later, I made use of the VT-d (intel_iommu) to allocate as much as 128MB (an arbitrary limit) which appear contiguous to the PCI device. I use vmalloc_user to allocate 128M, then write all the physically continuous segments in a scatterlist, then use pci_map_sg which works it's way to intel_iommu. The device DMA addresses I get back are contiguous over the whole 128M. Neat! Our VT-d capable devices still use this strategy.
>
> This large memory is mission-critical in making the acquisition device autonomous (real-time), yet keep the DMA implementation very simple. Today, we are re-using this device on a CPU architecture that has no IOMMU (intel E6XX/EG20T) and want to avoid creating a scatter-gather scheme between my driver and the FPGA (PCI device).
>
> So I went back to the old pci_alloc_coherent method, which although limited to 4 MB, will do for early development phases. Instead of 2.6.35, we are doing preliminary development using 2.6.37 and will probably use 3.1 or more later. The cpu/device shared memory maps (1MB and 4MB) are allocated using pci_alloc_coherent and handed to UIO as physical memory using the dma_addr_t returned by the pci_alloc func.
>
> The 1st memory map is written to by CPU and read from device.
> The 2nd memory map is typically written by the device and read by the CPU, but future features may have the device also read this memory.
>
> My initial testing on the atom E6XX show the PCI device failing when trying to read from the first memory map.
Any kernel messages in the logs that could help?
[...]
Thanks,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-18 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-18 21:16 extra large DMA buffer for PCI-E device under UIO Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-11-18 22:08 ` Greg KH
2011-11-21 15:31 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-11-21 17:36 ` Greg KH
2011-11-21 18:17 ` Hans J. Koch
[not found] ` <4A52B447-8E21-43F6-A38E-711E36F89A34@gmail.com>
2011-11-21 19:29 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-11-22 15:24 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-11-22 15:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22 16:54 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-11-22 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-11-22 17:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22 17:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22 17:54 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-11-22 18:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22 18:52 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-11-22 19:50 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-11-23 8:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22 16:05 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-11-22 19:57 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2013-01-23 2:00 ` Jean-François Dagenais
2011-11-18 22:27 ` Hans J. Koch [this message]
2011-11-21 15:10 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-11-21 15:47 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2011-11-21 16:01 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111118222718.GF22904@local \
--to=hjk@hansjkoch.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jeff.dagenais@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox