From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756650Ab1KUUg0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:36:26 -0500 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:32009 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756293Ab1KUUgY (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:36:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:36:14 -0500 From: Chris Mason To: Wu Fengguang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: lower the dirty balance poll interval Message-ID: <20111121203614.GE28259@shiny> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Mason , Wu Fengguang , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <20111117122403.GA32363@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111117122403.GA32363@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4ECAB647.0046,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:24:03PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty > limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the > next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm. Thanks Wu, were you planning on pushing this through your tree or should I take it? -chris