From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755295Ab1KUW3v (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:29:51 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:50534 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755349Ab1KUW3t (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:29:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:29:45 -0600 From: Seth Forshee To: Matthew Garrett Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dell-wmi: Change debug statements from pr_info to pr_debug Message-ID: <20111121222945.GA14306@thinkpad-t410> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Garrett , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1321908536-5163-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <20111121205230.GA14467@srcf.ucam.org> <20111121211438.GH6736@thinkpad-t410> <20111121211809.GA14950@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111121211809.GA14950@srcf.ucam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:18:09PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:14:38PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:52:30PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > They're intended to be there, in the same way that the keyboard code > > > generates unknown scancode errors. We want to know when users have keys > > > that don't work. > > > > All right, but what about the unknown WMI events? Those are the bigger > > problem anyway, as at least one machine (the Latitude XT2) can generate > > a lot of these messages for unknown reasons. It doesn't appear that > > anyone has been making use of these messages since we still only support > > one event. Would you object to demoting that one? > > Those can probably be ignored, but again it would be nice to find out > what they actually mean so we know whether we can do anything with them. > Any chance of you being able to work with Dell on that? I'll see what I can do.