From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067Ab1KVLyL (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:54:11 -0500 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:53559 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758594Ab1KVLyJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:54:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:54:08 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" , William Cohen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Cree , Deng-Cheng Zhu , Anton Blanchard , Eric B Munson , Heiko Carstens , Paul Mundt , "David S. Miller" , Richard Kuo , Stephane Eranian , Arun Sharma , Vince Weaver , "ostrikov@nvidia.com" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] perf, arch: Rework perf_event_index() Message-ID: <20111122115407.GM20518@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20111121145114.049265181@chello.nl> <20111121145337.533322271@chello.nl> <20111121172323.GH20611@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <1321903090.28118.21.camel@twins> <20111121203145.GA7301@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <1321907755.28118.30.camel@twins> <20111121224343.GA7862@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <1321961180.5148.31.camel@twins> <20111122114700.GJ20518@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <1321962710.5148.34.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1321962710.5148.34.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:51:50AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:47 +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > OK, I had interpreted your "we don't always have" to be slightly more > common than just A15. It was introduced for v7.1, of which the A15 is the first implementation. A7 and future cores should also have it (it's part of the architected timers which are really needed for doing virtualisation properly). Will