linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks with given pids
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:33:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122153326.GD322@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201111221204.39235.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Hello,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:04:38PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> This whole userspace C/R stuff and being able to set the child's pid has potential
> of being very useful for GDB too, allowing a much better reimplementation of its
> old checkpointing feature [*], and allowing for a faster reverse debugging
> implementation, by being able to do faster rewinding -- restore snapshot and replay
> instructions up to N (by single stepping or running to breakpoint), rather than
> manually undoing the effects of each instruction, one by one.
> 
> IOW, root only would be a shame from GDB's perspective.

Would CAP_CHECKPOINT be a shame too?  I'm reluctant about priviledge
through fd inheritance mostly because of its unusualness.  I don't
think priv management is a good problem space for small creative
solutions.  We're much better off with mundane mechanisms which people
are already familiar with and is easy to account for.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-22 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-17 11:41 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks with given pids Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 11:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] pids: Make alloc_pid return error Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] pids: Split alloc_pidmap into parts Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 11:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] pids: Make it possible to clone tasks with given pids Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 15:32   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-17 15:49     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 16:00       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-17 17:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-17 19:04     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-17 18:36   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-18 10:05     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 15:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create " Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-17 16:01   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-17 16:02     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-18 23:30     ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21  9:15       ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-21 22:50         ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-22 11:11           ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-22 12:04             ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-22 15:33               ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-23 16:20                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-23 16:24                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-23 17:26                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-23 17:37                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-23 18:19                     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-23 20:14                       ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-24 17:31                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-25 10:14                           ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-25 16:22                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-25 16:44                               ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-25 16:54                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-25 17:03                                   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-25 22:36                                     ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-27 16:24                                       ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks with?given pids Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-27  9:41                             ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks with given pids Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-11-27 17:34                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-27 18:47                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 10:38                               ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-28 16:25                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-22 15:23             ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-22 15:29               ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-22 16:30               ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-22 16:44                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-22 19:29                   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-01-26 23:28                   ` Kay Sievers
2011-11-22 21:16           ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111122153326.GD322@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).