From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
Subject: tty related lockdep trace during bootup on 3.2-rc2
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:38:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111123033850.GA11380@redhat.com> (raw)
>From Linus' current tree...
related to 5dc2470c602da8851907ec18942cd876c3b4ecc1 maybe ?
Dave
[ 40.778011] ======================================================
[ 40.780010] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 40.780010] 3.2.0-rc2+ #8
[ 40.780010] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 40.780010] modem-manager/1141 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 40.780010] (big_tty_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81682807>] tty_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] but task is already holding lock:
[ 40.780010] (open_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa032b321>] acm_tty_close+0x41/0xc0 [cdc_acm]
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] -> #1 (open_mutex){+.+...}:
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c1d9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x210
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff8168003e>] __mutex_lock_common+0x5e/0x4f0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81680604>] mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffffa032b715>] acm_tty_open+0x35/0x230 [cdc_acm]
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff813c1087>] tty_open+0x247/0x5d0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811b5408>] chrdev_open+0x258/0x350
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811ad9a4>] __dentry_open+0x384/0x550
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811af194>] nameidata_to_filp+0x74/0x80
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811c0b6c>] do_last+0x26c/0x920
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811c1335>] path_openat+0xd5/0x3e0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811c1762>] do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811af297>] do_sys_open+0xf7/0x1d0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811af390>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81689f82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] -> #0 (big_tty_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c112e>] __lock_acquire+0x16ce/0x1c40
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c1d9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x210
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff8168003e>] __mutex_lock_common+0x5e/0x4f0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81680604>] mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81682807>] tty_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff813c91ad>] tty_port_close_start+0x17d/0x210
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffffa032b32f>] acm_tty_close+0x4f/0xc0 [cdc_acm]
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff813c09e7>] tty_release+0x167/0x5c0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811b252e>] fput+0xfe/0x2d0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811adee9>] filp_close+0x69/0x90
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811ae1d0>] sys_close+0xc0/0x1a0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81689f82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] CPU0 CPU1
[ 40.780010] ---- ----
[ 40.780010] lock(open_mutex);
[ 40.780010] lock(big_tty_mutex);
[ 40.780010] lock(open_mutex);
[ 40.780010] lock(big_tty_mutex);
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] 1 lock held by modem-manager/1141:
[ 40.780010] #0: (open_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa032b321>] acm_tty_close+0x41/0xc0 [cdc_acm]
[ 40.780010]
[ 40.780010] stack backtrace:
[ 40.780010] Pid: 1141, comm: modem-manager Not tainted 3.2.0-rc2+ #8
[ 40.780010] Call Trace:
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81675378>] print_circular_bug+0x202/0x213
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c112e>] __lock_acquire+0x16ce/0x1c40
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81021f62>] ? native_sched_clock+0x22/0x70
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810ae2c5>] ? sched_clock_local+0x25/0x90
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c1d9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x210
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81682807>] ? tty_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c180a>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x16a/0x350
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff8168003e>] __mutex_lock_common+0x5e/0x4f0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81682807>] ? tty_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810c2796>] ? mark_held_locks+0x86/0x150
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff816807ae>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81682807>] ? tty_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81680604>] mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81682807>] tty_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff813c91ad>] tty_port_close_start+0x17d/0x210
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffffa032b32f>] acm_tty_close+0x4f/0xc0 [cdc_acm]
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff813c09e7>] tty_release+0x167/0x5c0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81021fb9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff810ae2c5>] ? sched_clock_local+0x25/0x90
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811b252e>] fput+0xfe/0x2d0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811adee9>] filp_close+0x69/0x90
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff811ae1d0>] sys_close+0xc0/0x1a0
[ 40.780010] [<ffffffff81689f82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
next reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 3:38 Dave Jones [this message]
2011-11-23 7:28 ` tty related lockdep trace during bootup on 3.2-rc2 Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 7:39 ` Cong Wang
2011-11-23 10:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-11-23 10:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-11-23 17:58 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 18:53 ` [RFC] cdc-acm: Fix potential deadlock (lockdep warning) Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 19:22 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-23 19:22 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 19:44 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-23 21:03 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-23 19:34 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-11-23 22:00 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-23 19:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-11-23 21:08 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 21:11 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-11-23 21:19 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-11-27 21:37 ` [RFC v2] " Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-28 18:15 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2011-11-23 7:29 ` tty related lockdep trace during bootup on 3.2-rc2 Cong Wang
2011-11-23 17:29 ` Havard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111123033850.GA11380@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hskinnemoen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox