From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752855Ab1KXScx (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:32:53 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:50614 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751888Ab1KXScw (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:32:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:32:48 +0000 From: Ben Hutchings To: Greg KH Cc: LKML , Marcus Osdoba , 649216@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20111124183248.GV3366@decadent.org.uk> References: <1322118279.2839.255.camel@deadeye> <20111124162426.GA4435@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111124162426.GA4435@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP configurations X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:24:26AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not > > very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP > > (tested on i386). > > Why, what will the topology look like for this? physical_package_id: "-1" core_id: "0" thread_siblings: "1" thread_siblings_list: "0" core_siblings: "1" core_siblings_list: "0" Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus