From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:39:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111129003930.GR2346@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111129002558.GA18182@somewhere.redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:26:01AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:22:44PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:24:44PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() don't need to check
> > > the irq nesting as they are not called from irq.
> > >
> > > Only check dyntick_nesting from rcu_irq_enter() and
> > > rcu_irq_exit().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/rcutree.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > I have queued this. I had to update it to deal with a recent conflicting
> > update, please see below for the new version.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
>
> Hmm, seems there is a problem. Look below:
Good eyes! How about the following instead?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit
Because tasks do not nest, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() do
not need to check for nesting. This commit therefore moves nesting
checks from rcu_idle_enter_common() to rcu_irq_exit() and from
rcu_idle_exit_common() to rcu_irq_enter().
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index bf085d7..860c02c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -350,10 +350,6 @@ static int rcu_implicit_offline_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
*/
static void rcu_idle_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
{
- if (rdtp->dynticks_nesting) {
- trace_rcu_dyntick("--=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
- return;
- }
trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
@@ -426,7 +422,10 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void)
oldval = rdtp->dynticks_nesting;
rdtp->dynticks_nesting--;
WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting < 0);
- rcu_idle_enter_common(rdtp, oldval);
+ if (rdtp->dynticks_nesting)
+ trace_rcu_dyntick("--=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
+ else
+ rcu_idle_enter_common(rdtp, oldval);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -439,10 +438,6 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void)
*/
static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
{
- if (oldval) {
- trace_rcu_dyntick("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
- return;
- }
smp_mb__before_atomic_inc(); /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
@@ -518,7 +513,10 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void)
oldval = rdtp->dynticks_nesting;
rdtp->dynticks_nesting++;
WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting == 0);
- rcu_idle_exit_common(rdtp, oldval);
+ if (oldval)
+ trace_rcu_dyntick("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
+ else
+ rcu_idle_exit_common(rdtp, oldval);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 21:24 [PATCH 0/4] rcu: Make new RCU dynticks API work with nohz cpusets Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-28 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-29 0:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-29 0:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-29 0:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-11-29 0:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-28 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: Irq nesting is always 0 on rcu_enter_idle_common Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-29 0:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-29 1:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-28 21:24 ` [PATCH 3/4 RFC] rcu: New rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit() APIs Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-28 21:24 ` [PATCH 4/4 RFC] rcu: New rcu_user_enter_irq() and rcu_user_exit_irq() APIs Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-28 21:53 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-29 1:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-29 5:21 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-29 14:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-29 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-29 13:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-29 5:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] rcu: Make new RCU dynticks API work with nohz cpusets Josh Triplett
2011-11-29 5:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-29 8:48 ` Josh Triplett
2011-11-29 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-29 18:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111129003930.GR2346@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox