From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753322Ab1K2Isk (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:48:40 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:54877 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752607Ab1K2Isi (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:48:38 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.147 X-Originating-IP: 50.43.15.19 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:48:31 -0800 From: Josh Triplett To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rcu: Make new RCU dynticks API work with nohz cpusets Message-ID: <20111129084831.GA21034@leaf> References: <1322515487-18690-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20111129052225.GB14546@leaf> <20111129054342.GA2375@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111129054342.GA2375@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:43:42PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:22:25PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:24:43PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > This is an attempt to make the current RCU dynticks API > > > working with the nohz cpusets. > > > > > > I believe the two first patches could be pushed in your trees. > > > Patches 3 and 4 are rather something I plan to apply in mine, > > > given they are not needed upstream yet. > > > > > > Waiting for your comments. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Frederic Weisbecker (4): > > > rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit > > > rcu: Irq nesting is always 0 on rcu_enter_idle_common > > > rcu: New rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit() APIs > > > rcu: New rcu_user_enter_irq() and rcu_user_exit_irq() APIs > > > > For the whole series: > > > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett > > Thank you, Josh! > > Does that cover the conflict-resolved versions of the first two? > > o https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/626 > o https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/624 Yes, for the ones with Frederic's further eagle-eyed fix. - Josh