public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Add the kernel.ns_last_pid control
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:22:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111129192245.GA7764@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED52083.8090605@parallels.com>

On 11/29, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> On 11/29/2011 09:47 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> +
> >> +static struct ctl_path kern_path[] = { { .procname = "kernel", }, { } };
> >> +
> >>  static __init int pid_namespaces_init(void)
> >>  {
> >>  	pid_ns_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(pid_namespace, SLAB_PANIC);
> >> +	register_sysctl_paths(kern_path, pid_ns_ctl_table);
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >
> > Hmm. This way it depends on CONFIG_PID_NS.
>
> Yes, since this _is_ for namespaces. As we've found out this is close to completely
> unusable in the initial namespace in which tasks are just forking without caring
> much about what CAP_SYS_ADMIN-s think about this.

I agree, it is not very much usable. Still I think it can be used.
Say, init can write RESERVED_PIDS to this file. Or you can use it
to test the pid-reuse problems.

> > Can't we simply add an entry into kern_table[] ?
>
> And store the .proc_handler function dealing with somewhat which is pid namespace
> specific in the same generic file?

Why not? In fact I think that, say, /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max should
act per-namespace too.

> > And without ns_, just /proc/sys/kernel/last_pid.
>
> But that's the namespace's last pid, not just some system-wide last pid.

Sure, it is not system wide. Unless you use it from the root ns.


OK. I do not really care. I think the patch is correct, lets do it
this way.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-28 15:21 [PATCH] sysctl: Add the kernel.ns_last_pid control Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-28 15:53 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 16:04   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-28 16:09     ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-29 17:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-29 18:12   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-11-29 19:22     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-01-12 22:49 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111129192245.GA7764@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox