From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] specific do_timer_cpu value for nohz off mode
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:11:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111130161131.31cdccff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111130152959.GA19205@sgi.com>
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:29:59 -0600
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
> +static ssize_t sysfs_store_do_timer_cpu(struct sys_device *dev,
> + struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct sysdev_ext_attribute *ea = SYSDEV_TO_EXT_ATTR(attr);
> + unsigned int new;
> + int rv;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
> + /* nohz mode not supported */
> + if (tick_nohz_enabled)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +#endif
> +
> + rv = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &new);
> + if (rv)
> + return rv;
> +
> + if (new >= NR_CPUS || !cpu_online(new))
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + *(unsigned int *)(ea->var) = new;
> + return size;
> +}
checkpatch tells us:
WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc
I think the check can just be removed? Surely cpu_online(1000000000)
will return false?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-08 19:11 [PATCH] specific do_timer_cpu value for nohz off mode Dimitri Sivanich
2011-11-23 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-30 15:29 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01 0:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-12-01 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-01 2:07 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01 2:13 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-01 16:37 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-02 20:14 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-02 20:22 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-02 22:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-12-01 2:06 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-01 2:34 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01 2:38 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-15 13:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-15 14:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-15 14:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-25 11:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-15 14:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-15 14:37 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-02-15 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-15 15:34 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-02-15 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-16 14:59 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2013-03-19 17:03 ` [PATCH][RFC] " Jiri Bohac
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-17 16:07 [PATCH] " Dimitri Sivanich
2011-08-17 16:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-08-23 19:56 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-09-02 8:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-02 19:29 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-09-02 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-02 20:39 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-08-03 19:57 Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111130161131.31cdccff.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox