public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu" 
	<android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"embeddedxen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<embeddedxen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Android-virt] [Embeddedxen-devel] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen port to Cortex-A15 / ARMv7 with virt extensions
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:10:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201151043.GG27394@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322735197.31810.191.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:26:37AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 18:32 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > KVM and Xen at least both fall into the single-return-value category,
> > > so we should be able to agree on a calling conventions. KVM does not
> > > have an hcall API on ARM yet, and I see no reason not to use the
> > > same implementation that you have in the Xen guest.
> > > 
> > > Stefano, can you split out the generic parts of your asm/xen/hypercall.h
> > > file into a common asm/hypercall.h and submit it for review to the
> > > arm kernel list?
> > 
> > Sure, I can do that.
> > Usually the hypercall calling convention is very hypervisor specific,
> > but if it turns out that we have the same requirements I happy to design
> > a common interface.
> 
> I expect the only real decision to be made is hypercall page vs. raw hvc
> instruction.
> 
> The page was useful on x86 where there is a variety of instructions
> which could be used (at least for PV there was systenter/syscall/int, I
> think vmcall instruction differs between AMD and Intel also) and gives
> some additional flexibility. It's hard to predict but I don't think I'd
> expect that to be necessary on ARM.
> 
> Another reason for having a hypercall page instead of a raw instruction
> might be wanting to support 32 bit guests (from ~today) on a 64 bit
> hypervisor in the future and perhaps needing to do some shimming/arg
> translation. It would be better to aim for having the interface just be
> 32/64 agnostic but mistakes do happen.

Given the way register banking is done on AArch64, issuing an HVC on a
32-bit guest OS doesn't require translation on a 64-bit hypervisor. We
have a similar implementation at the SVC level (for 32-bit user apps on
a 64-bit kernel), the only modification was where a 32-bit SVC takes a
64-bit parameter in two separate 32-bit registers, so packing needs to
be done in a syscall wrapper.

I'm not closely involved with any of the Xen or KVM work but I would
vote for using HVC than a hypercall page.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-29 14:53 [ANNOUNCE] Xen port to Cortex-A15 / ARMv7 with virt extensions Stefano Stabellini
2011-11-29 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 11:39   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-11-30 13:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 13:25       ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-11-30 14:32         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 14:51           ` Pawel Moll
2011-11-30 16:27           ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-30 18:15             ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 18:32               ` [Embeddedxen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2011-12-01 10:26                 ` Ian Campbell
2011-12-01 15:10                   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2011-12-01 15:42                     ` [Android-virt] " Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-01 16:02                       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-12-01 16:44                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-01 16:57                           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-12-01 15:52                     ` Ian Campbell
2011-12-01 15:12                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-12-01 10:34               ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-30 14:11     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-30 14:20       ` Stefano Stabellini
     [not found]   ` <CAAhSdy3F1oUQP=f_Tig4_MnufwPRpNooZYW8_cSTAse7aOaDoA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-30 11:41     ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111201151043.GG27394@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=embeddedxen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox