linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2a/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: select clock rate by CPU type
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:06:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201190642.GW31337@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112011954.18258.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>

* Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [111201 10:19]:
> On Thursday 01 of December 2011 at 19:22:54, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [111201 01:35]:
> > > On Wednesday 30 of November 2011 at 23:28:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > We should also now be able to remove all the CONFIG_OMAP_ARM_XXXMHZ options
> > > > too, right?
> > > 
> > > Right, but then, perhaps the initial version of patch 2a/5, which 
> > > already started removing them, from omap1_defconfig for now, then going 
> > > into the right direction while unblocking another regression fix (3/5), 
> > > _is_ a good candidate for an rc fix?
> > 
> > But we did not allow dpll1 reprogramming earlier either,
> 
> Wrong. Without OMAP_CLOCKS_SET_BY_BOOTLOADER selected, we always did, 
> but only once, early at boot, before ck_dpll1_p->rate was set first from 
> omap1_clk_init(), and never retried later, that's why that check which I 
> removed with 3/5 was never in the game until e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408.

Yeah you're right. You found what caused the regression :)
 
> > so we should
> > not need to make all these changes during the -rc cycle. I'm suspecting
> > that we've had this same behaviour for a really long time, and we just
> > have not seen it as omap1_defconfig had OMAP_CLOCKS_SET_BY_BOOTLOADER
> > option set.
> > 
> > So I'm baffled how your board would be booting at a different rate
> > compared to v3.1, it seems that the logic has not changed there. Or
> > else we have some simple bug somewhere.
> > 
> > Care to try to verify at what point your system started booting at
> > 60MHz rate?
> 
> Since e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408, I guess, and it's hard 
> to confirm wituout bisecting the issue with too early sram call, back 
> until things still worked like before map_io related changes. I will do 
> that if you decide we should try to revert.

No need to bisect, I think we can just reset ck_dpll1_p->rate for
systems booting at below 60MHz rate to force the reprogramming.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-27  3:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 default rate reprogramming method Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 17:45   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-28 22:00     ` [PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 22:32       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-30 20:57     ` [PATCH 2a/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: select clock rate by CPU type Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 22:28       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 10:10         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 18:22           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:54             ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:06               ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-12-09  1:51       ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: Set the omap1623 sram size to 16K Tony Lindgren
     [not found]     ` <201112010310.43890.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
     [not found]       ` <20111201022750.GY13928@atomide.com>
2011-12-01  9:54         ` [PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 10:21           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 17:17           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:38             ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:04               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 19:23                 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:46                   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 20:30                     ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                   ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 21:16                     ` [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP1: Update dpll1 default rate reprogramming method Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-02  2:09                     ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Tony Lindgren
2011-12-02 17:02                       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming not actually allowed Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 17:46   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] init/calibrate.c: allow for recalibration of loops per jiffy Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 15:39   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-28 22:30     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP1: recalibrate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-29  0:25   ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  8:42     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-09 10:00       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09 10:09         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-10  0:25         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-10 12:04           ` Janusz Krzysztofik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111201190642.GW31337@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).