From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755135Ab1LAWOY (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:14:24 -0500 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:41969 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754638Ab1LAWOX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:14:23 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: LXThS3CzUag6i9fzkjOo5LEaiK7wKdz4VC1B+TzHyNS/ 1322777662 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:13:37 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, Linus Torvalds , Christoph Lameter , Tejun Heo , David Howells , David McCullough , D Jeff Dionne , Greg Ungerer , Paul Mundt , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: export vmalloc_sync_all symbol to GPL modules Message-ID: <20111201221337.GB3365@kroah.com> References: <1322775683-8741-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1322775683-8741-2-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20111201215700.GA16782@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111201215700.GA16782@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:57:00PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:41:13PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > LTTng needs this symbol exported. It calls it to ensure its tracing > > buffers and allocated data structures never trigger a page fault. This > > is required to handle page fault handler tracing and NMI tracing > > gracefully. > > We: > > a) don't export symbols unless they have an intree-user lttng is now in-tree in the drivers/staging/ area. See linux-next for details if you are curious. > b) especially don't export something as lowlevel as this one. Mathieu, there's nothing else you can do to get this information? Or does lttng really want such lowlevel data? thanks, greg k-h