Re: [PATCH 00/10] [GIT PULL] tracing: various fixes

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 09:33 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ingo,
> > > 
> > > Please pull the latest tip/perf/core tree, which can be found at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
> > > tip/perf/core
> > > 
> > > Head SHA1: 7e9a49ef542610609144d1afcd516dc3fafac4d6
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Gleb Natapov (1):
> > >       jump_label: jump_label_inc may return before the code is patched
> > > 
> > > Ilya Dryomov (1):
> > >       tracing: fix event_subsystem ref counting
> > > 
> > > Jiri Olsa (1):
> > >       tracing/latency: Fix header output for latency tracers
> > > 
> > > Li Zefan (2):
> > >       tracing: Restore system filter behavior
> > >       tracing: update Documentation on max preds limit
> > > 
> > > Steven Rostedt (5):
> > >       tracing: Add boiler plate for subsystem filter
> > >       lockdep: Show subclass in pretty print of lockdep output
> > >       ftrace: Remove force undef config value left for testing
> > >       perf: Fix parsing of __print_flags() in TP_printk()
> > >       ftrace: Fix hash record accounting bug
> > > 
> > > ----
> > >  Documentation/trace/events.txt      |    2 --
> > >  include/linux/ftrace_event.h        |    2 ++
> > >  kernel/jump_label.c                 |    3 ++-
> > >  kernel/lockdep.c                    |   30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> > >  kernel/trace/ftrace.c               |    5 +++--
> > >  kernel/trace/trace.c                |   15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  kernel/trace/trace.h                |    1 +
> > >  kernel/trace/trace_events.c         |    1 -
> > >  kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c  |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c        |   13 ++++++++++++-
> > >  kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c   |   13 ++++++++++++-
> > >  tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c |    2 ++
> > >  12 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Pulled, thanks a lot Steve!
> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> All these were bug fixes and I was hopping that it would have 
> been pushed to Linus. I know it just missed the merge window 
> (it was posted during -rc1) but they are fixes, not 
> enhancements, and I still believe they are fine for an -rc3 
> release. I would have even had it pushed before -rc1 but it 
> took time running them through all my tests.

Hm, not all were regression fixes and the branch was named 
*/core so i took it into perf/core.

Could you perhaps cherry-pick the most crutial regression fixes 
into an urgent branch? We could still push that upstream.

Thanks,

	Ingo