From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
hzpeterchen@gmail.com, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:56:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111205085632.5976fe96@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201111160016.09174.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2337 bytes --]
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:16:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:27:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, November 14, 2011, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > There may be an issue when the user issue "reboot/shutdown" command, then
> > > > the device has shut down its hardware, after that, this runtime-pm featured
> > > > device's driver will probably be scheduled to do its suspend routine,
> > > > and at its suspend routine, it may access hardware, but the device has
> > > > already shutdown physically, then the system hang may be occurred.
> > > >
> > > > I ran out this issue using an auto-suspend supported USB devices, like
> > > > 3G modem, keyboard. The usb runtime suspend routine may be scheduled
> > > > after the usb controller has been shut down, and the usb runtime suspend
> > > > routine will try to suspend its roothub(controller), it will access
> > > > register, then the system hang occurs as the controller is shutdown.
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
> > >
> > > Greg, do you want me to take this one?
> >
> > Please do:
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
>
> Done, thanks!
>
Hi,
this patches causes a problem for me.
Specifically it makes it impossible to power-down a device which uses twl4030
for power control on an omap3 processor.
To perform the shutdown we need to send a command over the i2c bus.
The relevant bus is called omap_i2c.1 and this is normally in suspend mode.
When a request is sent, omap_i2c_xfer uses pm_runtime_get_sync to wake it up,
performs the transfer, then calls pm_runtime_put to let it go back to sleep.
So it is asleep when the new pm_runtime_disable() call is made, so it stays
asleep, omap_i2c_xfer cannot wake it, the transfer doesn't happen and the
system doesn't get powered off.
So here is a device that should *not* have pm disabled at shutdown.
So I feel this fix is a little too heavy-handed.
I don't fully understand the problem scenario described above but it seems to
me that if the auto-suspend timer can fire after the hardware has been shut
down, then maybe the hardware-shutdown should be disabling that timer. Maybe?
Suggestions?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-04 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 0:43 [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown Peter Chen
2011-11-14 9:54 ` Ming Lei
2011-11-14 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-14 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-15 0:59 ` Greg KH
2011-11-15 23:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04 21:56 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-12-05 2:42 ` Alan Stern
2011-12-05 3:37 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05 3:26 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05 4:42 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05 5:12 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05 9:01 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05 9:05 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05 16:02 ` Alan Stern
2011-12-05 18:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05 20:55 ` Alan Stern
2011-12-05 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-06 15:26 ` [PATCH] Driver core: leave runtime PM enabled during system shutdown Alan Stern
2011-12-06 21:34 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-06 21:48 ` Greg KH
2011-12-06 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-06 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-05 4:53 ` [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown NeilBrown
2011-12-05 5:53 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05 8:08 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05 8:32 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05 8:52 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05 3:29 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05 5:09 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111205085632.5976fe96@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox