From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756227Ab1LELu6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:50:58 -0500 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:54453 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756115Ab1LELu5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:50:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:50:55 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Axel Lin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , Liam Girdwood , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: zylonite-wm97xx - replace IRQ_GPIO() with gpio_to_irq() Message-ID: <20111205115054.GH11150@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1323083592.6763.5.camel@phoenix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1323083592.6763.5.camel@phoenix> X-Cookie: Is this really happening? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:13:12PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Since commit 6384fd "ARM: pxa: rename IRQ_GPIO to PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ", > I got below buid errors due to implicit declaration of function 'IRQ_GPIO'. Acked-by: Mark Brown I guess that for bisection this should go via Eric's tree as it introduced the issue.