public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chen Peter-B29397 <B29397@freescale.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"hzpeterchen@gmail.com" <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>,
	Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:08:27 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111205190827.68b179f4@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35AB98346D25394A9354ED89C4D76587228F32@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1603 bytes --]

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:53:27 +0000 Chen Peter-B29397 <B29397@freescale.com>
wrote:

> 
>  
> > > > So it is asleep when the new pm_runtime_disable() call is made, so it
> > stays
> > > > asleep, omap_i2c_xfer cannot wake it, the transfer doesn't happen and
> > the
> > > > system doesn't get powered off.
> > > >
> > > > So here is a device that should *not* have pm disabled at shutdown.
> > > >
> > > > So I feel this fix is a little too heavy-handed.
> > >
> > > Maybe the device's runtime PM should not be disabled if
> > > there is no ->shutdown defined in its driver, how about the blew?
> > 
> > Thanks, but that won't actually help.
> > 
> > dev->bus->shutdown is i2c_device_shutdown so there is a shutdown method.
> > However i2c_device_shutdown just finds the driver can calls
> > driver->shutdown(), and that is the 'shutdown' that is NULL.
> > 
> Then, i2c should be registered before than twl4030 as a platform device, since
> twl4030 is an i2c device. Just let i2c shut down later than twl4030's. 

It almost certainly is, but that is totally irrelevant.

The problem has nothing to do with ordering and nothing much to do with
->shutdown() being called.

The problem is simply that pm_runtime_disable() is being called on all
devices, and that stops devices that are asleep from waking up.

I think the intention of putting that call in was to stop devices that are
awake from going to sleep, and maybe that is justified.  But stopping devices
that are asleep from waking up isn't.

NeilBrown


> 
> > Thanks,
> > NeilBrown
> > 
> > 
> > 


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-05  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-14  0:43 [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown Peter Chen
2011-11-14  9:54 ` Ming Lei
2011-11-14 22:28   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-14 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-15  0:59   ` Greg KH
2011-11-15 23:16     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04 21:56       ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05  2:42         ` Alan Stern
2011-12-05  3:37           ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05  3:26         ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05  4:42           ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05  5:12             ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05  9:01               ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05  9:05                 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-05 16:02                   ` Alan Stern
2011-12-05 18:35                     ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05 20:55                       ` Alan Stern
2011-12-05 22:32                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-06 15:26                           ` [PATCH] Driver core: leave runtime PM enabled during system shutdown Alan Stern
2011-12-06 21:34                             ` NeilBrown
2011-12-06 21:48                             ` Greg KH
2011-12-06 22:05                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-06 22:03                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-05  4:53           ` [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown NeilBrown
2011-12-05  5:53             ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05  8:08               ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-12-05  8:32                 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05  8:52                   ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05  3:29         ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-12-05  5:09           ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111205190827.68b179f4@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=B29397@freescale.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox