Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver core: disable device's runtime pm during shutdown

[NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2621 bytes --]

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:32:27 +0000 Chen Peter-B29397 <B29397@freescale.com>
wrote:

>  
> > > > stays
> > > > > > asleep, omap_i2c_xfer cannot wake it, the transfer doesn't happen
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > > system doesn't get powered off.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So here is a device that should *not* have pm disabled at
> > shutdown.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I feel this fix is a little too heavy-handed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe the device's runtime PM should not be disabled if
> > > > > there is no ->shutdown defined in its driver, how about the blew?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, but that won't actually help.
> > > >
> > > > dev->bus->shutdown is i2c_device_shutdown so there is a shutdown
> > method.
> > > > However i2c_device_shutdown just finds the driver can calls
> > > > driver->shutdown(), and that is the 'shutdown' that is NULL.
> > > >
> > > Then, i2c should be registered before than twl4030 as a platform device,
> > since
> > > twl4030 is an i2c device. Just let i2c shut down later than twl4030's.
> > 
> > It almost certainly is, but that is totally irrelevant.
> > 
> > The problem has nothing to do with ordering and nothing much to do with
> > ->shutdown() being called.
> > 
> > The problem is simply that pm_runtime_disable() is being called on all
> > devices, and that stops devices that are asleep from waking up.
> > 
> Please correct me if I am wrong
> 1. This change only affects when the user issues "reboot" or "shutdown"

well "halt -p" or "poweroff", but yes.

> 2. The pm_runtime_disable(dev) is only be called before this "dev" is
> coming to shutdown

Yes, but the important point is that is being called before pm_power_off is
called.

> 3. If i2c bus/driver->shutdown is not called, its runtime pm is still enabled.

I think you mean "disabled" ??

Yes, but I don't see how that is relevant.

> 4. You may issue i2c xfer after i2c bus/driver->shutdown is called.  

Yes, but again I cannot see the relevance.

NeilBrown


> 
> > I think the intention of putting that call in was to stop devices that
> > are
> > awake from going to sleep, and maybe that is justified.  But stopping
> > devices
> > that are asleep from waking up isn't.
> > 
> > NeilBrown
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > NeilBrown
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]