From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932562Ab1LEUS6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:18:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51608 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932147Ab1LEUS5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:18:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:20:19 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Rusty Russell , Sasha Levin , Linus Torvalds , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Amit Shah , Christian Borntraeger , Krishna Kumar , Pawel Moll , Wang Sheng-Hui , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RFC] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout Message-ID: <20111205202019.GB18939@redhat.com> References: <20111114181854.GA24953@redhat.com> <20111205111605.73b60faa@jbarnes-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111205111605.73b60faa@jbarnes-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:18:55 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > Add a flexible mechanism to specify virtio configuration layout, using > > pci vendor-specific capability. A separate capability is used for each > > of common, device specific and data-path accesses. > > > > Warning: compiled only. > > This patch also needs to be split up, pci_iomap changes > > also need arch updates for non-x86. > > There might also be more spec changes. > > > > Posting here for early feedback, and to allow Sasha to > > proceed with his "kvm tool" work. > > > > Changes from v1: > > Updated to match v3 of the spec, see: > > Subject: [PATCHv3 RFC] virtio-spec: flexible configuration layout > > Message-ID: <20111110122436.GA13144@redhat.com> > > In-Reply-To: <20111109195901.GA28155@redhat.com> > > Looks like this conflicts with your other iomap changes... I didn't > check your latest tree; do you just add another patch on top for the > virtio changes now? > > Thanks, Yes. Rusty asked for more changes so that isn't yet pushed. > -- > Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center