From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Add entries in buffer and total entries to default output header
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:45:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206174608.055787103@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20111206174537.048874021@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5273 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Knowing the number of event entries in the ring buffer compared
to the total number that were written is useful information. The
latency format gives this information and there's no reason that the
default format does not.
This information is now added to the default header, along with the
number of online CPUs:
# tracer: nop
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 159836/64690869 #P:4
#
# _-----=> irqs-off
# / _----=> need-resched
# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# || / _--=> preempt-depth
# ||| / delay
# TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | |||| | |
<idle>-0 [000] ...2 49.442971: local_touch_nmi <-cpu_idle
<idle>-0 [000] d..2 49.442973: enter_idle <-cpu_idle
<idle>-0 [000] d..2 49.442974: atomic_notifier_call_chain <-enter_idle
<idle>-0 [000] d..2 49.442976: __atomic_notifier_call_chain <-atomic_notifier
The above shows that the trace contains 159836 entries, but
64690869 were written. One could figure out that there were
64531033 entries that were dropped.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index fa5cee6..7392070 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1845,6 +1845,33 @@ static void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
trace_event_read_unlock();
}
+static void
+get_total_entries(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long *total, unsigned long *entries)
+{
+ unsigned long count;
+ int cpu;
+
+ *total = 0;
+ *entries = 0;
+
+ for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
+ count = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(tr->buffer, cpu);
+ /*
+ * If this buffer has skipped entries, then we hold all
+ * entries for the trace and we need to ignore the
+ * ones before the time stamp.
+ */
+ if (tr->data[cpu]->skipped_entries) {
+ count -= tr->data[cpu]->skipped_entries;
+ /* total is the same as the entries */
+ *total += count;
+ } else
+ *total += count +
+ ring_buffer_overrun_cpu(tr->buffer, cpu);
+ *entries += count;
+ }
+}
+
static void print_lat_help_header(struct seq_file *m)
{
seq_puts(m, "# _------=> CPU# \n");
@@ -1857,14 +1884,27 @@ static void print_lat_help_header(struct seq_file *m)
seq_puts(m, "# \\ / ||||| \\ | / \n");
}
-static void print_func_help_header(struct seq_file *m)
+static void print_event_info(struct trace_array *tr, struct seq_file *m)
{
+ unsigned long total;
+ unsigned long entries;
+
+ get_total_entries(tr, &total, &entries);
+ seq_printf(m, "# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: %lu/%lu #P:%d\n",
+ entries, total, num_online_cpus());
+ seq_puts(m, "#\n");
+}
+
+static void print_func_help_header(struct trace_array *tr, struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ print_event_info(tr, m);
seq_puts(m, "# TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION\n");
seq_puts(m, "# | | | | |\n");
}
-static void print_func_help_header_irq(struct seq_file *m)
+static void print_func_help_header_irq(struct trace_array *tr, struct seq_file *m)
{
+ print_event_info(tr, m);
seq_puts(m, "# _-----=> irqs-off\n");
seq_puts(m, "# / _----=> need-resched\n");
seq_puts(m, "# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq\n");
@@ -1881,32 +1921,14 @@ print_trace_header(struct seq_file *m, struct trace_iterator *iter)
struct trace_array *tr = iter->tr;
struct trace_array_cpu *data = tr->data[tr->cpu];
struct tracer *type = current_trace;
- unsigned long entries = 0;
- unsigned long total = 0;
- unsigned long count;
+ unsigned long entries;
+ unsigned long total;
const char *name = "preemption";
- int cpu;
if (type)
name = type->name;
-
- for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
- count = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(tr->buffer, cpu);
- /*
- * If this buffer has skipped entries, then we hold all
- * entries for the trace and we need to ignore the
- * ones before the time stamp.
- */
- if (tr->data[cpu]->skipped_entries) {
- count -= tr->data[cpu]->skipped_entries;
- /* total is the same as the entries */
- total += count;
- } else
- total += count +
- ring_buffer_overrun_cpu(tr->buffer, cpu);
- entries += count;
- }
+ get_total_entries(tr, &total, &entries);
seq_printf(m, "# %s latency trace v1.1.5 on %s\n",
name, UTS_RELEASE);
@@ -2184,9 +2206,9 @@ void trace_default_header(struct seq_file *m)
} else {
if (!(trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_VERBOSE)) {
if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_IRQ_INFO)
- print_func_help_header_irq(m);
+ print_func_help_header_irq(iter->tr, m);
else
- print_func_help_header(m);
+ print_func_help_header(iter->tr, m);
}
}
}
--
1.7.7.3
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 17:45 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: updates Steven Rostedt
2011-12-06 17:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add irq, preempt-count and need resched info to default trace output Steven Rostedt
2011-12-06 17:45 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206174608.055787103@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox