From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/children entry v2
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 13:41:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111207094144.GB21678@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111206223558.GQ29781@moon>
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:35:58AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 02:33:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ...
> >
> > It's also worth adding a warning about this into the documentation for
> > this procfs file. Documentation which this patch forgot to provide,
> > btw!
> >
> >
>
> Yes, thanks for comments Andrew, I already got the feeling that I've
> missed documentation update from the start_brk /proc patch ;)
>
> I'll address all issues, thanks!
>
I hope this one addresses all nits.
Cyrill
---
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/children entry v3
There is no easy way to make a reverse parent->children chain
from a task status, in turn children->parent provided with "PPid"
field.
So instead of walking over all pids in system to figure out what
children a task have -- we add explicit /proc/<pid>/children entry,
since kernel already has this kind of information but it is not
yet exported.
Note that filling user-space buffer is done in iterative manner
where each iteration is protected via RCU read lock, which means
if between iterations a new task is added it might be missed in
output and to have a consistent image of which children are really
present in system the task should be either frozen or stopped
together with all children.
v2:
- Kame suggested to use a separated /proc/<pid>/children entry
instead of poking /proc/<pid>/status
- Andew suggested to use rcu facility instead of locking
tasklist_lock
- Tejun pointed that non-seekable seq file might not be
enough for tasks with large number of children
v3:
- To be on a safe side use %lu format for pid_t printing
- Update changelog and documentation
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
---
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 15 ++++++++
fs/proc/array.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/proc/base.c | 1
fs/proc/internal.h | 1
4 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.git/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
+++ linux-2.6.git/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Table of Contents
3.4 /proc/<pid>/coredump_filter - Core dump filtering settings
3.5 /proc/<pid>/mountinfo - Information about mounts
3.6 /proc/<pid>/comm & /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/comm
+ 3.7 /proc/<pid>/children - Information about task children
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1545,3 +1546,17 @@ a task to set its own or one of its thre
is limited in size compared to the cmdline value, so writing anything longer
then the kernel's TASK_COMM_LEN (currently 16 chars) will result in a truncated
comm value.
+
+3.7 /proc/<pid>/children - Information about task children
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+This file provides a fast way to retrieve children pids of the
+task pointed by <pid>. The format is a stream of pids separated
+by space with a new line at the end. If a task has no children at
+all -- only a new line returned.
+
+Note that filling user-space buffer is done in iterative manner where
+each iteration is protected via RCU read lock, which means if between
+iterations a new task is added it might be missed in output and
+to have a consistent image of which children are really present in
+system the task should be either frozen or stopped together with
+all children.
Index: linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/proc/array.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -547,3 +547,69 @@ int proc_pid_statm(struct seq_file *m, s
return 0;
}
+
+static int children_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = container_of(v, struct task_struct, sibling);
+ return seq_printf(seq, " %lu", (unsigned long)pid_vnr(task_pid(task)));
+}
+
+static void *children_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ task = seq->private;
+ if (task)
+ return seq_list_start(&task->children, *pos);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *children_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = seq->private;
+ if (task)
+ return seq_list_next(v, &task->children, pos);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void children_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ seq_printf(seq, "\n");
+}
+
+static const struct seq_operations children_seq_ops = {
+ .start = children_seq_start,
+ .next = children_seq_next,
+ .stop = children_seq_stop,
+ .show = children_seq_show,
+};
+
+static int children_seq_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ int ret = seq_open(file, &children_seq_ops);
+ if (!ret) {
+ struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
+ m->private = (void *)get_proc_task(inode);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+int children_seq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
+ if (m->private)
+ put_task_struct(m->private);
+
+ seq_release(inode, file);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+const struct file_operations proc_pid_children_operations = {
+ .open = children_seq_open,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .llseek = seq_lseek,
+ .release = children_seq_release,
+};
Index: linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/base.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/proc/base.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -3204,6 +3204,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_
INF("cmdline", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_cmdline),
ONE("stat", S_IRUGO, proc_tgid_stat),
ONE("statm", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_statm),
+ REG("children", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_children_operations),
REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_maps_operations),
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
REG("numa_maps", S_IRUGO, proc_numa_maps_operations),
Index: linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/internal.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ extern int proc_pid_statm(struct seq_fil
struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task);
extern loff_t mem_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig);
+extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_children_operations;
extern const struct file_operations proc_maps_operations;
extern const struct file_operations proc_numa_maps_operations;
extern const struct file_operations proc_smaps_operations;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 18:10 [PATCH] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/children entry v2 Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-06 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-06 22:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-07 9:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2011-12-07 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-07 18:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-07 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-07 19:03 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-07 19:19 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-07 20:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-07 21:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-08 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-08 16:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-08 21:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-08 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-08 22:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-09 15:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-09 15:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-12-09 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-09 17:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111207094144.GB21678@moon \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox