public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org>
Cc: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	morgan@kernel.org, serue@us.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	kzak@redhat.com
Subject: Re: chroot(2) and bind mounts as non-root
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:04:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112081704.22453.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191.49202.793643.397028@quad.stoffel.home>

On Wednesday 07 December 2011, John Stoffel wrote:
> >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> writes:
> 
> Colin> I've recently been doing some work in software compilation, and it'd be
> Colin> really handy if I could call chroot(2) as a non-root user.  The reason
> Colin> to chroot is to help avoid "host contamination" - I can set up a build
> Colin> root and then chroot in.  The reason to do it as non-root is, well,
> Colin> requiring root to build software sucks for multiple obvious reasons.
> 
> What's wrong with using 'fakeroot' or tools like that instead?  Why
> does the Kernel need to be involved like this?  I'm not against your
> proposal so much, as trying to understand how compiling a bunch of
> source requires this change.

I think the better question to ask is what is missing from 'schroot', which
is commonly used for exactly this purpose. Is it just about avoing the
suid bit for /usr/bin/schroot or something else?

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-08 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-07 17:54 chroot(2) and bind mounts as non-root Colin Walters
2011-12-07 19:36 ` John Stoffel
2011-12-08 16:10   ` Colin Walters
2011-12-08 18:14     ` John Stoffel
2011-12-08 18:26       ` Colin Walters
2011-12-09  0:49         ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2011-12-09 14:55         ` John Stoffel
2011-12-09 15:06           ` Colin Walters
2011-12-08 17:04   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-12-08 17:15     ` Colin Walters
2011-12-07 19:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-08 16:58   ` Colin Walters
2011-12-07 20:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-07 20:54   ` Alan Cox
2011-12-15 18:55     ` Andrew G. Morgan
2011-12-16 15:44       ` Colin Walters
2011-12-18  1:22         ` Andrew G. Morgan
2011-12-18 15:19           ` Colin Walters
2011-12-10  5:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-12-12 16:41   ` Colin Walters
2011-12-12 23:11     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-12-15 20:56       ` Colin Walters
2011-12-16  6:14         ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-12-18 16:01           ` Colin Walters
2011-12-19  0:55             ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-12-19  4:06               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-12-19  9:22                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-12-20 16:49                   ` Colin Walters
2011-12-20 21:23               ` Colin Walters
2011-12-21 18:15           ` Steve Grubb
2012-01-03 23:13             ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201112081704.22453.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=john@stoffel.org \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morgan@kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=walters@verbum.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox