From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Code cleanup
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:25:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111208192533.GA19310@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112042000070.5963@cactuar.localhost>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:01:39PM -0200, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0000, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> >>This patch removes commented code, useless comments, blank lines and fix
> >>coding style of the headers of functions.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@gmail.com>
> >>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> >>Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> >>---
> >> /*
> >>- * Description: Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>- *
> >>- * Parameters:
> >>- * In:
> >>- * dwIoBase - I/O base address
> >>- * byContntOffset - address of EEPROM
> >>- * byTestBits - bits to test
> >>- * Out:
> >>- * none
> >>- *
> >>- * Return Value: true if all test bits off; otherwise false
> >>- *
> >>+ * Test if bits off in eeprom
> >> */
> >
> >Some of these seems sort of useful. It might be better to change
> >them to doc-book format instead of deleting them:
> >
> >/**
> >* SROMbIsRegBitsOff() - Test if bits off in eeprom
> >* @dwIoBase: I/O base address
> >* @byContntOffset: Address of EEPROM
> >* @byTestBits: Bits to test
> >*
> >* Returns true if all test bits off; otherwise false.
> >*/
> >
> >There is a howto in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion Dan. I will do it for these 3 patches.
>
> Greg, please delte this patches, I will sent them again.
Ugh, "which" patches are you referring to?
I see lots here from you, with different back-and-forth from Dan, and I
don't really see an easy way to tell which thread from which, given that
you didn't thread the patches using git-send-email.
So, I've dropped all patches from you from my patch queue, can you
please resend the ones that I am supposed to apply that have been
reviewed by Dan as being acceptable?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-08 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-02 19:58 [PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Code cleanup Marcos Paulo de Souza
2011-12-03 8:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-12-04 22:01 ` Marcos Paulo de Souza
2011-12-08 19:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111208192533.GA19310@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcos.mage@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox