From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] x86: Add workaround to NMI iret woes
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:02:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111209130216.GA14718@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111209124026.GB14470@Krystal>
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com) wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 14:30 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > If the first NMI hits a breakpoint and loses NMI context, and then it
> > > hits another breakpoint and while processing that breakpoint we get a
> > > nested NMI. When processing a breakpoint, the stack changes to the
> > > breakpoint stack. If another NMI comes in here we can't rely on the
> > > interrupted stack to be the NMI stack.
> >
> > As I wrote this part of the change log, I thought of another nasty
> > gotcha with breakpoints in NMIs.
> >
> > If you have a breakpoint in both normal context and NMI context. When
> > the breakpoint is being processed, if an NMI comes in and it too
> > triggers a breakpoint, this processing of the breakpoint has the same
> > problem as nested NMIs. The NMI breakpoint handler will corrupt the
> > stack of the breakpoint that was being processed when the NMI triggered.
> >
> > I'm not sure how to handle this case. We could do something similar in
> > the break point code to handle the same thing. But this just seems
> > really ugly.
> >
> > Anyone with any better ideas?
>
> The nesting counters + code region address checks I proposed a few days
> ago should handle this correctly. Here is a very slightly updated
> version:
after a quick IRC discussion with Peter Zijlstra, one thing seems to be
missing here to handle the INT3->NMI->INT3 issue: this could be achieved
by splitting the DEBUG stack in 2 sub-stacks, and letting the int3
handler keep track of its nesting within its own stack with an extra
"int3_nest_count". AFAIU, supporting 2 nested int3 should be enough.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> variables used:
>
> cpu-local int nmi_nest_count;
> cpu-local int nmi_latch;
> __nmi_epilogue_begin (pointer to text)
> __nmi_epilogue_end (pointer to text)
> REAL_NMI_STACK: beginning of the stack used for real nmi handler
> LATCHED_NMI_STACK: beginning of the stack used for latched nmi handler
>
> int in_nmi_epilogue(void)
> {
> return (instruction_pointer() >= __nmi_epilogue_begin
> && instruction_pointer() < __nmi_epilogue_end);
> }
>
> int in_nmi(void)
> {
> return nmi_nest_count > 0;
> }
>
> /* Use REAL_NMI_STACK */
> real_nmi_handler: /* always running with nmis disabled */
> /*
> * We disable interrupts to ensure we don't have to deal with IRQs
> * when NMIs get re-enabled due to an iret from a fault/exception.
> */
> local_irq_disable();
> if (in_nmi_epilogue()) {
> nmi_latch = 0;
> /* set stack pointer to start of LATCHED_NMI_STACK */
> /* populate start of LATCHED_NMI_STACK with values for iret */
> goto latched_nmi_handler;
> }
> if (in_nmi()) {
> nmi_latch = 1;
> iret
> }
> nmi_nest_count++;
> /* set stack pointer to start of LATCHED_NMI_STACK */
> /* populate start of LATCHED_NMI_STACK with values for iret */
> goto latched_nmi_handler;
>
>
> /* Use LATCHED_NMI_STACK */
> latched_nmi_handler: /* Can fault and reenable NMIs. */
>
> [ execute actual system NMI handler, including faults, int3, ... ]
>
> /*
> * note: test nmi_latch and iret instruction are within the epilogue
> * range to deal with latch test vs iret non-atomicity. If a real nmi
> * nests over this range, it clears the nmi_latch flag and just
> * restarts the latched nmi handler. No faults/exceptions/interrupts
> * are permitted in this region, except for the real NMI and MCEs
> * (TODO).
> */
> __nmi_epilogue_begin:
> /*
> * here we are restarting the latched nmi handler if an nmi happened
> * while nested within the nmi nest count.
> */
> if (nmi_latch) {
> nmi_latch = 0;
> goto latched_nmi_handler;
> }
> nmi_nest_count--;
> iret /* restores interrupts */
> __nmi_epilogue_end:
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mathieu
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-08 19:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] x86: Find a way to allow breakpoints in NMIs Steven Rostedt
2011-12-08 19:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] x86: Do not schedule while still in NMI context Steven Rostedt
2011-12-08 19:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86: Document the NMI handler about not using paranoid_exit Steven Rostedt
2011-12-08 19:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] x86: Add workaround to NMI iret woes Steven Rostedt
2011-12-08 19:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 2:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-09 15:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-09 15:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 17:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 17:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-09 18:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 16:49 ` Jason Baron
2011-12-09 17:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 12:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-09 13:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2011-12-09 14:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-09 15:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111209130216.GA14718@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox