From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: gregkh@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ostrikov@nvidia.com,
adobriyan@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] kref: inline and barriers
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:43:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111210104341.592561407@chello.nl> (raw)
>From time to time people on #kernelnewbies ask what the difference is between
kref and using atomic_t yourself. And I keep having to tell them that kref is
the slow and weird option.
These patches try and cure some of that, it inlines all functions and removes
the superfluous memory barriers that are there for no good reason at all.
next reply other threads:[~2011-12-10 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-10 10:43 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-12-10 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] kref: Inline all functions Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-10 14:32 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-10 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 22:11 ` Greg KH
2011-12-13 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 17:15 ` Greg KH
2011-12-13 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 19:11 ` Greg KH
2011-12-13 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-10 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] kref: Implement kref_put in terms of kref_sub Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-10 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] kref: Remove the memory barriers Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-10 14:07 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-10 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-10 15:57 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-10 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-11 2:22 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-11 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-11 12:59 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-11 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-11 20:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 3:48 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-12 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 9:57 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-12 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-12 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 11:19 ` Ming Lei
2011-12-12 11:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-12 11:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-12-12 10:20 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-12-12 19:30 ` Greg KH
2011-12-12 22:56 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-12-12 23:14 ` Greg KH
2011-12-13 11:51 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-12-13 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 9:49 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-12-12 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 15:24 ` Greg KH
2011-12-12 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-12 10:10 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111210104341.592561407@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ostrikov@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox