From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86-ML <x86@kernel.org>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, MCE: Drain mcelog buffer
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:19:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111212141913.GC6799@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0207C53569FE594381A4F2EB66570B2A018EFB7A7D@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:08:59PM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Well, off the top of my head, we could probably _not_ delete the already
> > logged MCEs (bool keep arg, or similar) and when the last one registers,
> > it passes keep=false and cleans them up. And since we probably know
> > which one is the last - order is enforced by the initcalls order -
> > we're done.
>
> Knowing when the last one has come is hard if there are modules as well
> as built-in registrants. We could save the whole list, and deliver a
> copy of the history of the world so far to each as they register (never
> deleting anything). But that sounds odd - why should a module loaded
> 6 months after system boot expect to see everything.
Well, currently the buffer overflows at the 32th entry so something that
registers 6 months after system boot will probably see unrelated errors
from 6 months ago depending on the error rate.
> I think if we ensure that the cpu decoder gets first chance to register,
> we should be OK with giving it all the pended stuff. We can defer doing
> something more complicated until the point that someone has a real use
> case.
Agreed, and this is currently the case on AMD and Intel, AFAICT, where
the i7 or sb edac module registers. We can always change it later if
required.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-08 14:08 [PATCH 0/2] x86, MCE: Catch the early worm Borislav Petkov
2011-12-08 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, mce: Add wrappers for registering on the decode chain Borislav Petkov
2011-12-08 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, MCE: Drain mcelog buffer Borislav Petkov
2011-12-09 18:19 ` Luck, Tony
2011-12-09 18:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-09 18:40 ` Luck, Tony
2011-12-09 19:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-09 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-12-12 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-12-09 6:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86, MCE: Catch the early worm Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111212141913.GC6799@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox