From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755189Ab1LMPlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:41:18 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:51618 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755026Ab1LMPlQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:41:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:41:08 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbottomley@parallels.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, bsingharora@gmail.com, devel@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] make 'none' field a flag Message-ID: <20111213154108.GF25802@google.com> References: <1323614738-7405-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1323614738-7405-5-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1323614738-7405-5-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:45:38PM +0100, Glauber Costa wrote: > There is no reason to have a flags field, and then a separate > bool field just to indicate if 'none' subsystem were explicitly > requested. > > Make it a flag > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa Same as the previous patch. Doesn't this change how remount conditions are checked? Thanks. -- tejun