Re: [PATCH 1/6] HWPOISON: clean up memory_failure() vs. __memory_failure()

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:

> There is only one caller of memory_failure(), all other users call
> __memory_failure() and pass in the flags argument explicitly. The
> lone user of memory_failure() will soon need to pass flags too.
> 
> Add flags argument to the callsite in mce.c. Delete the old memory_failure()
> function, and then rename __memory_failure() without the leading "__".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |    9 +++++--
>  drivers/base/memory.c            |    2 +-
>  include/linux/mm.h               |    3 +-
>  mm/hwpoison-inject.c             |    4 +-
>  mm/madvise.c                     |    2 +-
>  mm/memory-failure.c              |   46 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 2af127d..265139d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -1046,11 +1046,14 @@ out:
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(do_machine_check);
>  
> -/* dummy to break dependency. actual code is in mm/memory-failure.c */
> -void __attribute__((weak)) memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int vector)
> +#ifndef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int vector, int flags)
>  {
>  	printk(KERN_ERR "Action optional memory failure at %lx ignored\n", pfn);

Btw., while at it, could we phrase this message in a more 
obvious way to users, such as 'Non-fatal memory failure at %lx 
ignored'?

Thanks,

	Ingo