From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758346Ab1LNXyy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:54:54 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37847 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755784Ab1LNXyv (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:54:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:54:36 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Denis Kuzmenko Cc: Will Deacon , Axel Lin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [linux-next] make s5p64x0_defconfig build error Message-ID: <20111214235436.GG14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1323838630.18517.1.camel@phoenix> <20111214123244.GE7122@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20111214191205.GF14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4EE93185.9030502@solonet.org.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EE93185.9030502@solonet.org.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:30:13AM +0200, Denis Kuzmenko wrote: > On 12/14/2011 09:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:32:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:57:10AM +0000, Axel Lin wrote: > > So... unless things change, we can expect Gemini, almost all Samsung > > stuff, shmobile, vt8500, and Telechips TCC8k to be at least broken at > > the next merge window. > > Mini2440 march (s3c24xx platform) is not broken in v3.2-rc5. Does that > mean that s3c24xx is untouched by this issue or this means that I should > use linux-next? Most of the completed changes are in linux-next for the restart changes. I have some additional commits (which were posted to the list as the 3rd sub-series), which I'm not planning to submit in their current form - they move things _towards_ sorting out the samsung stuff, but they're all incomplete. These continue to be a part of my 'reset' branch. Basically, the comments in the commit summary line marked with XXX need addressing - and folk need to get out of the habbit of thinking "it's an include file, it must go into somewhere called 'include'." Instead, put includes local to a set of files in a directory in that same directory. Author: Russell King Date: Sun Nov 6 16:22:23 2011 +0000 ARM: restart: plat-samsung: remove plat/reset.h and s5p_reset_hook Now that s5p_reset_hook is unused, we can get rid of plat/reset.h and the s5p_reset_hook code in plat/system-reset.h. Signed-off-by: Russell King Author: Russell King Date: Sun Nov 6 16:20:11 2011 +0000 ARM: restart: s5pv210: use new restart hook XXX WIP XXX WHY IS THERE NO LOCAL HEADERS IN arch/arm/mach-exynos4 XXX Hook these platforms restart code into the new restart hook rather than using arch_reset(). Signed-off-by: Russell King Author: Russell King Date: Sun Nov 6 13:24:20 2011 +0000 ARM: restart: exynos4: use new restart hook XXX WIP XXX WHY IS THERE NO LOCAL HEADERS IN arch/arm/mach-exynos4 XXX Hook these platforms restart code into the new restart hook rather than using arch_reset(). Signed-off-by: Russell King