From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759114Ab1LPNWR (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:22:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32677 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751985Ab1LPNWI (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:22:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:21:56 +0100 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: David Rientjes Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] slub: document setting min order with debug_guardpage_minorder > 0 Message-ID: <20111216132155.GA14271@redhat.com> References: <1321633507-13614-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20111212145948.GA2380@redhat.com> <201112130021.41429.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:41:34PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > > + When debug_guardpage_minorder > 0 parameter is specified, the > > > + minimum possible order is used and cannot be changed. > > > > Well, I'm not sure what you wanted to say, actually? How does one change > > debug_guardpage_minorder (or specify it), for example? Is it a kernel > > command-line switch? > > > > Yeah, we'll need a reference to Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt. > > > Also I'm not sure what "cannot be changed" is supposed to mean. Does it > > mean that /sys/cache/slab/cache/order has no effect in that case? > > > > Good point, we should say that "this tunable" cannot be used to change the > order at runtime if debug_guardpage_minorder is used on the command line. > > Stanislaw, one more revision? Ehh, I silently hoped that someone else with better English skills could fix it ;-) As Andrew already applied my patch (and fix whitespace) I'll post the incremental patch in the next e-mail. Thanks Stanislaw