linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors (unjumbled version)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:35:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111216163549.GD12397@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0279870@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 04:22:25PM -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> All non-urgent actions (reporting low severity errors and handling
> "action-optional" errors) are now handled by a work queue. This
> means that TIF_MCE_NOTIFY can be used to block execution for a
> thread experiencing an "action-required" fault until we get all
> cpus out of the machine check handler (and the thread that hit
> the fault into mce_notify_process().
> 
> We use the new mce_{save,find,clear}_info() API to get information
> from do_machine_check() to mce_notify_process(), and then use the
> newly improved memory_failure(..., MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) to handle
> the error (possibly signalling the process).
> 
> Update some comments to make the new code flows clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> [Version posted earlier had the diff included in the commit comment,
>  and then the real copy of the diff - making it hard to read. Sorry.]
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |   71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 7d7303a..dfd20a6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -982,7 +982,9 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>  	barrier();
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * When no restart IP must always kill or panic.
> +	 * When no restart IP might need to kill or panic.
> +	 * Assume the worst for now, but if we find the
> +	 * severity is MCE_AR_SEVERITY we have other options.
>  	 */
>  	if (!(m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV))
>  		kill_it = 1;
> @@ -1036,12 +1038,6 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Kill on action required.
> -		 */
> -		if (severity == MCE_AR_SEVERITY)
> -			kill_it = 1;
> -
>  		mce_read_aux(&m, i);
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -1062,6 +1058,8 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	m = *final;
> +
>  	if (!no_way_out)
>  		mce_clear_state(toclear);
>  
> @@ -1080,7 +1078,7 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>  	 * support MCE broadcasting or it has been disabled.
>  	 */
>  	if (no_way_out && tolerant < 3)
> -		mce_panic("Fatal machine check on current CPU", final, msg);
> +		mce_panic("Fatal machine check on current CPU", &m, msg);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the error seems to be unrecoverable, something should be
> @@ -1089,11 +1087,13 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>  	 * high, don't try to do anything at all.
>  	 */
>  
> -	if (kill_it && tolerant < 3)
> +	if (worst != MCE_AR_SEVERITY && kill_it && tolerant < 3)
>  		force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
>  
> -	/* notify userspace ASAP */
> -	set_thread_flag(TIF_MCE_NOTIFY);
> +	if (worst == MCE_AR_SEVERITY) {
> +		mce_save_info(m.addr);
> +		set_thread_flag(TIF_MCE_NOTIFY);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (worst > 0)
>  		mce_report_event(regs);
> @@ -1107,6 +1107,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(do_machine_check);
>  #ifndef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>  int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int vector, int flags)
>  {
> +	if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
> +		return -ENXIO; /* panic? */

Yes, an AR error _is_ an uncorrectable error so in order to stay
backwards-compatible, we should panic here unconditionally IMO.

>  	printk(KERN_ERR "Uncorrected memory error in page 0x%lx ignored\n"
>  		"Rebuild kernel with CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE=y for smarter handling\n", pfn);
>  
> @@ -1115,27 +1117,46 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int vector, int flags)
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> - * Called after mce notification in process context. This code
> - * is allowed to sleep. Call the high level VM handler to process
> - * any corrupted pages.
> - * Assume that the work queue code only calls this one at a time
> - * per CPU.
> - * Note we don't disable preemption, so this code might run on the wrong
> - * CPU. In this case the event is picked up by the scheduled work queue.
> - * This is merely a fast path to expedite processing in some common
> - * cases.
> + * Called in process context that interrupted by MCE and marked with
> + * TIF_MCE_NOTFY, just before returning to errorneous userland.

      TIF_MCE_NOTIFY


> + * This code is allowed to sleep.
> + * Attempt possible recovery such as calling the high level VM handler to
> + * process any corrupted pages, and kill/signal current process if required.
> + * Action required errors are handled here.
>   */
>  void mce_notify_process(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long pfn;
> -	mce_notify_irq();
> -	while (mce_ring_get(&pfn))
> -		memory_failure(pfn, MCE_VECTOR, 0);
> +	struct mce_info *mi = mce_find_info();
> +
> +	if (!mi)
> +		mce_panic("Lost address", NULL, NULL);

Yeah, maybe "Lost physical address for unconsumed uncorrectable error"

> +	pfn = mi->paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	clear_thread_flag(TIF_MCE_NOTIFY);
> +
> +	pr_err("Uncorrected hardware memory error in user-access at %llx",
> +		 mi->paddr);
> +	if (memory_failure(pfn, MCE_VECTOR, MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) < 0) {
> +		pr_err("Memory error not recovered");
> +		force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
> +	} else {
> +		pr_err("Memory error recovered");

No need for that because memory_failure() is chatty enough already, due
to action_result()?

> +	}
> +	mce_clear_info(mi);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Action optional processing happens here (picking up
> + * from the list of faulting pages that do_machine_check()
> + * placed into the "ring").
> + */
>  static void mce_process_work(struct work_struct *dummy)
>  {
> -	mce_notify_process();
> +	unsigned long pfn;
> +
> +	while (mce_ring_get(&pfn))
> +		memory_failure(pfn, MCE_VECTOR, 0);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
> @@ -1225,8 +1246,6 @@ int mce_notify_irq(void)
>  	/* Not more than two messages every minute */
>  	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(ratelimit, 60*HZ, 2);
>  
> -	clear_thread_flag(TIF_MCE_NOTIFY);
> -
>  	if (test_and_clear_bit(0, &mce_need_notify)) {
>  		/* wake processes polling /dev/mcelog */
>  		wake_up_interruptible(&mce_chrdev_wait);
> -- 

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-15 19:59 [PATCH 0/6] x86, mce: machine check recovery for applications [updated] Tony Luck
2011-12-08 22:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86, mce: Recognise machine check bank signature for data path error Tony Luck
2011-12-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] HWPOISON: Add code to handle "action required" errors Tony Luck
2011-12-13 17:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86, mce: create helper function to save addr/misc when needed Tony Luck
2011-12-14 23:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86, mce: Add mechanism to safely save information in MCE handler Tony Luck
2011-12-16  0:13   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-12-16  8:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] HWPOISON: clean up memory_failure() vs. __memory_failure() Tony Luck
2011-12-16  8:17   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-15 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors Tony Luck
2011-12-16  0:14   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-12-16  0:29     ` Tony Luck
2011-12-16  0:22       ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors (unjumbled version) Tony Luck
2011-12-16 16:35         ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-12-17 19:25           ` Tony Luck
2011-12-16  0:51     ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors Tony Luck
2011-12-16 23:36       ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors (new version) Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111216163549.GD12397@aftab \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).