From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752982Ab1LTU5X (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:57:23 -0500 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:53848 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751514Ab1LTU5O (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:57:14 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 98.234.237.12 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/aRPR4amUF95Kd8ICqG4x4 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:57:06 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7][RESEND] ARM: OMAP1: ams-delta: register latch dependent devices later Message-ID: <20111220205706.GH17267@atomide.com> References: <1323634328-856-1-git-send-email-jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <201112200028.32947.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <20111220180610.GB24444@atomide.com> <201112202134.36802.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112202134.36802.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Janusz Krzysztofik [111220 12:03]: > On Tuesday 20 of December 2011 at 19:06:11, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > To deal with the init order issues, you can pass a set_power > > function pointer in platform_data that the driver can use. Or > > set up a fixed regulator for it. > > I'm already working on the follow up patch series mentioned in the cover > letter, and yes, I'm using the fixed regulator. Be patient, please, as > my resources are somehow limited. Yes, I understand. For this patch I'm fine with the late_initcall changes Russell suggested, then the rest can be done in separate patches later on. Regards, Tony