public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
	levinsasha928@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] kvm: Lock down device assignment
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:03:11 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111223110311.GC24308@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111221045636.5773.11289.stgit@bling.home>

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:58:57PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> v2: Update API documentation for each patch
> v3: Incorporate Sasha's comments: kobject path, separate func, and CONFIG_SYSFS
> 
> Two patches to try to better secure the device assignment ioctl.
> This firt patch makes KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU a mandatory
> option when assigning a device.  I don't believe we have any
> users of this option, so I think we can skip any deprecation
> period, especially since it's existence is rather dangerous.
> 
> The second patch introduces some file permission checking that Avi
> suggested.  If a user has been granted read/write permission to
> the PCI sysfs BAR resource files, this is a good indication that
> they have access to the device.  We can't call sys_faccessat
> directly (not exported), but the important bits are self contained
> enough to include directly.  This still works with sudo and libvirt
> usage, the latter already grants qemu permission to these files.
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
> ---
> 
> Alex Williamson (2):
>       kvm: Device assignment permission checks
>       kvm: Remove ability to assign a device without iommu support

Applied, thanks.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-23 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-21  4:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] kvm: Lock down device assignment Alex Williamson
2011-12-21  4:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kvm: Remove ability to assign a device without iommu support Alex Williamson
2011-12-21  4:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kvm: Device assignment permission checks Alex Williamson
2011-12-21 10:34   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-12-23 11:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111223110311.GC24308@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox