From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix to allow mounting a hierarchy by name
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:45:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120105174507.GC18486@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EFD531C.50300@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:58:52PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Normal filesystems can have multi mount points, and an fs instance
> is identified by device name, but cgroupfs ignores device name like
> other pseudo filesystems. Instead a set of subsystems is used, so
> to mount the same cgroupfs instance in different mount points, we
> can do this:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /cgroup1
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /cgroup2
>
> Now we have the "none" option, so a cgroupfs can have no subsystems
> bound to it, and we allow multi instances of such cgroupfs, so we
> have to assign names to each instance:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o none,name=hier1 xxx /cgroup1
> # mount -t cgroup -o none,name=hier2 xxx /cgroup2
>
> Then we want to also mount "hier1" in another mount point, we can't
> do this:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o none xxx /mnt
>
> because we have two different instances with "none" subsystem. So
> we specify its name:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o none,name=hier1 xxx /mnt
>
> Hope I have made things clear to you?
mount --bind? It's not exactly the same thing but I don't think the
differences would matter for cgroup. Also, what's the use case for
mounting the same cgroup directory multiple times? Why is that
necessary? Is it useful for some namespace-savvy setup?
> What I try to fix here is the behavior of "mount -t cgroup -o name=xxx ..."
> (no other options are specified), so what behavior do we want?
>
> 1. find if any existing cgroupfs instance matches the name, which is
> the orginal behavior.
>
> 2. the same as "mount -t cgroup -o all,name=xxx ...", which is the
> current behavior due to the commit that broke (1).
>
> 3. make it invalid and fail to mount.
>
> 4. any other idea?
I guess I'll apply the patches but it still seems like a silly
redundant feature. If not, please enlighten me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-05 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-27 2:10 [PATCH] cgroup: fix to allow mounting a hierarchy by name Li Zefan
2011-12-27 6:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Li Zefan
2012-01-05 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-27 16:35 ` [PATCH] " Tejun Heo
2011-12-28 6:10 ` Li Zefan
2011-12-28 6:12 ` Li Zefan
2011-12-28 16:36 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-29 2:50 ` Li Zefan
2011-12-29 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-30 5:58 ` Li Zefan
2012-01-05 2:20 ` Li Zefan
2012-01-05 17:45 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-01-06 2:24 ` Li Zefan
2012-01-06 2:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120105174507.GC18486@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).