linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix to allow mounting a hierarchy by name
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:45:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120105174507.GC18486@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EFD531C.50300@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hello,

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:58:52PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Normal filesystems can have multi mount points, and an fs instance
> is identified by device name, but cgroupfs ignores device name like
> other pseudo filesystems. Instead a set of subsystems is used, so
> to mount the same cgroupfs instance in different mount points, we
> can do this:
> 
> 	# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /cgroup1
> 	# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /cgroup2
>
> Now we have the "none" option, so a cgroupfs can have no subsystems
> bound to it, and we allow multi instances of such cgroupfs, so we
> have to assign names to each instance:
> 
> 	# mount -t cgroup -o none,name=hier1 xxx /cgroup1
> 	# mount -t cgroup -o none,name=hier2 xxx /cgroup2
> 
> Then we want to also mount "hier1" in another mount point, we can't
> do this:
> 
> 	# mount -t cgroup -o none xxx /mnt
> 
> because we have two different instances with "none" subsystem. So
> we specify its name:
> 
> 	# mount -t cgroup -o none,name=hier1 xxx /mnt
> 
> Hope I have made things clear to you?

mount --bind?  It's not exactly the same thing but I don't think the
differences would matter for cgroup.  Also, what's the use case for
mounting the same cgroup directory multiple times?  Why is that
necessary?  Is it useful for some namespace-savvy setup?

> What I try to fix here is the behavior of "mount -t cgroup -o name=xxx ..."
> (no other options are specified), so what behavior do we want?
> 
> 1. find if any existing cgroupfs instance matches the name, which is
> the orginal behavior.
> 
> 2. the same as "mount -t cgroup -o all,name=xxx ...", which is the
> current behavior due to the commit that broke (1).
> 
> 3. make it invalid and fail to mount.
> 
> 4. any other idea?

I guess I'll apply the patches but it still seems like a silly
redundant feature.  If not, please enlighten me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-05 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-27  2:10 [PATCH] cgroup: fix to allow mounting a hierarchy by name Li Zefan
2011-12-27  6:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Li Zefan
2012-01-05 18:00   ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-27 16:35 ` [PATCH] " Tejun Heo
2011-12-28  6:10   ` Li Zefan
2011-12-28  6:12     ` Li Zefan
2011-12-28 16:36     ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-29  2:50       ` Li Zefan
2011-12-29 16:23         ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-30  5:58           ` Li Zefan
2012-01-05  2:20             ` Li Zefan
2012-01-05 17:45             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-01-06  2:24               ` Li Zefan
2012-01-06  2:27                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120105174507.GC18486@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).