From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: fix mov immediate emulation for 64-bit operands
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 10:26:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120108102657.9a5dd6534ea4ae829073ff6e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C814BCA3-145A-410F-8F4F-CE5617DDB1A2@gmail.com>
Hi,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2012, at 10:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > On 01/07/2012 12:21 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >> MOV immediate instruction (opcodes 0xB8-0xBF) may take 64-bit operand.
> >> The previous emulation implementation assumes the operand is no longer than 32.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> >
> > There are exactly two such instructions: MOV immediate (B8-BF) and MOV
> > moff (A0-A3); you may want to check the latter too.
> >
> > -hpa
> >
>
> These instructions (A0-A3) seem to be already covered by the decode_abs function.
Like these how about introducing a new flag and change the following entries in the
decode table to indicate possible 64bit immediate:
/* 0xB8 - 0xBF */
X8(I(DstReg | SrcImm | Mov, em_mov)),
Checking the opcode byte at the operand decoding stage, like below, does not look nice:
(IMO so better ask Avi)
+ if (size == 8 && ((ctxt->b & 0xF8) != 0xB8 || ctxt->twobyte))
size = 4;
I am now cleaning up x86_decode_insn() to make each decoding stage clearer.
Takuya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-08 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1325967346-12539-1-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
2012-01-07 20:21 ` [PATCH] KVM: fix mov immediate emulation for 64-bit operands Nadav Amit
2012-01-07 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-08 0:30 ` Nadav Amit
2012-01-08 1:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa [this message]
2012-01-08 8:47 ` Nadav Amit
2012-01-08 14:05 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-08 14:08 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-08 14:44 ` Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120108102657.9a5dd6534ea4ae829073ff6e@gmail.com \
--to=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox