From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755458Ab2AIJCa (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 04:02:30 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:21897 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467Ab2AIJCZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 04:02:25 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="54604640" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:08:21 +0100 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Mark Brown Cc: Sangbeom Kim , lrg@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] regulator: Add S5M8767A regulator driver Message-ID: <20120109090821.GK13679@sortiz-mobl> References: <1325225153-32389-1-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com> <20120108231657.GD13679@sortiz-mobl> <20120109064703.GT29065@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120109064703.GT29065@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:47:04PM -0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:16:57AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > Mark, are you ok with this one ? As it depends on the previous MFD patches, > > I'll have to take it through the MFD tree. > > I've not reviwed it yet and there should be no dependency on the MFD > tree so no need to merge it via that - the fact that there's a Kconfig > dependency on the MFD means that the two can get merged in any order. Not only a Kconfig dependency, but also the regulator driver including some of the headers defined in the mfd patch: +#include +#include So, both need to get merged at the same time. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/