From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755864Ab2AJJo5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:44:57 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60625 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754469Ab2AJJo4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:44:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:44:52 +0000 From: Mel Gorman To: Hillf Danton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: fix setting reclaim mode Message-ID: <20120110094452.GC4118@suse.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:05:03PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > The check for under memory pressure is corrected, then lumpy reclaim or > reclaim/compaction could be avoided either when for order-O reclaim or > when free pages are already low enough. > No explanation of problem, how this patch fixes it or what the impact is. At a glance, this will have the impact of using sync reclaim at low reclaim priorities. This is unexpected so needs much better explanation. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs