From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
len.brown@intel.com, anhua.xu@intel.com, chaohong.guo@intel.com,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,sched: Fix sched_smt_power_savings totally broken
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:14:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110164455.GA17432@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326107156.2442.59.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2012-01-09 12:05:56]:
> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 19:14 -0500, Youquan Song wrote:
> > Fine, I will base your suggestion to develop another patch soon.
> >
>
> >
> > @@ -3923,6 +3923,10 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct
> > sched_domain *sd,
> > SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> > if (!sgs->group_capacity)
> > sgs->group_capacity = fix_small_capacity(sd, group);
> > +
> > + if (sched_smt_power_savings)
> > + sgs->group_capacity *= 2;
>
> Note, this has the hard-coded assumption you only have 2 threads per
> core, which while true for intel, isn't true in general. I think you
> meant to write *= group->group_weight or somesuch.
>
> Also, you forgot to limit this to the SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER domain, you're
> now doubling the capacity for all domains.
>
> Furthermore, have a look at the SD_PREFER_SIBLING logic and make sure
> you're not fighting that.
Hi Peter,
I think I had proposed the following fix earlier. Can we revisit this
now? This works, but it is not the best solution.
sched: Fix group_capacity for sched_smt_powersavings
sched_smt_powersavings for threaded systems need this fix for
consolidation to sibling threads to work. Since threads have
fractional capacity, group_capacity will turn out to be one
always and not accommodate another task in the sibling thread.
This fix makes group_capacity a function of cpumask_weight that
will enable the power saving load balancer to pack tasks among
sibling threads and keep more cores idle.
Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8e42de9..77ac4ca 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4010,6 +4010,21 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
*/
if (prefer_sibling && !local_group && sds->this_has_capacity)
sgs.group_capacity = min(sgs.group_capacity, 1UL);
+ /*
+ * If power savings balance is set at this domain, then
+ * make capacity equal to number of hardware threads to
+ * accommodate more tasks until capacity is reached.
+ */
+ else if (sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE)
+ sgs.group_capacity =
+ cpumask_weight(sched_group_cpus(sg));
+
+ /*
+ * The default group_capacity is rounded from sum of
+ * fractional cpu_powers of sibling hardware threads
+ * in order to enable fair use of available hardware
+ * resources.
+ */
if (local_group) {
sds->this_load = sgs.avg_load;
@@ -4432,7 +4447,8 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct sched_domain *sd, int idle,
* move_tasks() will succeed. ld_moved will be true and this
* active balance code will not be triggered.
*/
- if (sched_mc_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
+ if (sched_mc_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
+ sched_smt_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 8:56 [PATCH] x86,sched: Fix sched_smt_power_savings totally broken Youquan Song
2012-01-09 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-09 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-09 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-09 11:00 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-09 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-09 16:03 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-09 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-09 17:05 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-09 14:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-05-18 10:19 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove stale power aware scheduling remnants and dysfunctional knobs tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-10 0:14 ` [PATCH] x86,sched: Fix sched_smt_power_savings totally broken Youquan Song
2012-01-09 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-10 5:58 ` Youquan Song
2012-01-09 23:52 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-10 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-10 14:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-01-10 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-10 14:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-01-10 15:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-01-10 16:49 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-10 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-10 19:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-10 16:54 ` Youquan Song
2012-01-10 16:51 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-10 19:01 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-11 3:52 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-11 17:37 ` Youquan Song
2012-01-10 16:44 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2012-01-09 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-09 14:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-01-09 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-10 2:12 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-10 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-10 1:54 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-01-10 8:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-01-09 15:37 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120110164455.GA17432@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anhua.xu@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chaohong.guo@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
--cc=youquan.song@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox