From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757261Ab2AKJDe (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:03:34 -0500 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:47470 "EHLO rcsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756117Ab2AKJD0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:03:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:04:31 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Xi Wang Cc: Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions , Haogang Chen , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: aacraid question: is maximum_num_containers supposed to be minimum? Message-ID: <20120111090430.GE16258@mwanda> References: <20120111082842.GA31452@elgon.mountain> <8654A042-17CA-4C02-8F34-554ED55B34F4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8654A042-17CA-4C02-8F34-554ED55B34F4@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4F0D505C.0015,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:38:55AM -0500, Xi Wang wrote: > On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > MAXIMUM_NUM_CONTAINERS is consistently used as a minimum not a maximum > > so I was wondering what was up with that? This is ancient code that > > predates git. >=20 > Check out some early discussion. ;-) >=20 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/3/85 Heh. That's weird that we were both looking at the same code so many years down the line. Still Haogang is assuming that MAXIMUM_NUM_CONTAINERS is supposed to be a minimum instead of it just being used that way by mistake. Mark is more familiar with code and thought it was supposed to be a maximum. regards, dan carpenter --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPDVCeAAoJEOnZkXI/YHqRfYYP/RNZn9IWSu77NqnnV4sKi/Yc poolk1upL8J46z3tK5cOyuxib6DbtL6AR+XAFGMVXns1Svu2K9Fq0bxHJd0F/nQs grBfgCSPARpeOYkx6OczDyV81Zsjv0sE+3+D517S7qTpROXFWdf9jdlpc02PRmhY VG9foy9VGQzAMknmNmYB4Jb3CvxrHralJZh5N10UqYfuQ9Ka3cYBs7/E3pdOKHk9 jnYtSrdAdewCAJ8vMmp7KW3Gv1uIbCy9wWyJ+pSNoAMkYF8TxlF3HqF7T+ogcsOY /mrKVsNujB8SkAn75APygndX3Qq1Wr8sh4eZdhoj6+8zc2TvZG5CaHNqV4Y5EyMQ Glh1oetkmMGHrLErZdSji1zA4c51OYzWnuKC/LHZjU89zRDADSUNVRJ2dWdPFQmv kQeY8lJZHcTLEgRNChs4HzMZ0lNIaNkvrKdbT6cZNJ9a0qT/KgiqlOVRBYl5Q4G3 1H3ComuDn7TcKWOjU14I5lKgJ2wOrrfTsgoTpGJGwjzkvgaMvxiCNS7LCJTHwS3B 8RGBZRIj45FvMStS4G+kSWNhrY9GQFkwb9zU93olkMAJqWhuI+UKvl2KxRFcYH/2 ET1uEp6tRV+kK28CjzaNKKbqyh62OTbbF3uOBiVWqXY0GbH6dO33REZn/paLPtWB CqZcxSHt483C4mdpGiQT =tKGx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP--